期刊文献+

电子商务法与竞争法的衔接:体系逻辑与执法展望 被引量:28

The Connection of E-commerce Law and Laws about Competition:System Logic and Future Enforcement
原文传递
导出
摘要 电子商务法中的竞争条款并未很好地处理其与竞争法的衔接关系。该法对滥用市场支配地位行为的补充规制没有深刻把握电子商务环境下的竞争特点,对滥用相对优势地位行为的独立规制不仅有破坏竞争法体系逻辑的风险,还可能对执法实践造成诸多困境。 The clauses about competition in the E-commerce Law do not deal well with its connection with the current laws about competition.The supplementary regulation on the abuse of the dominant position of the market in the E-commerce Law does not have a profound understanding of the competitive characteristics in the environment of e-commerce.The independent regulation on the abuse of comparative advantage in the E-commerce Law may not only undermine the system logic of current laws about competition,but also result in legal dilemmas in law enforcement.
作者 朱理 曾友林 Zhu Li;Zeng Youlin
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期104-112,共9页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词 电子商务法 竞争法 补充规制 独立规制 E-commerce Law laws about competition supplementary regulation independent regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1(以) 巴拉克 (Barak,A.),著.民主国家的法官(M)法律出版社, 2011
  • 2Evans David S.'Attention Rivalry Among Online Platforms'. University of Chicago Institute for Law&Economics Olin Research Paper No.627 . 2013
  • 3郑友德,主编.德国反不正当竞争法研究(M)法律出版社, 2010
  • 4(英) 戴维斯,等著.竞争与反垄断中的数量技术(M)中国人民大学出版社, 2013
  • 5Martin Campbell-Kelly.From Airline Reservations to Sonic the Hedgehog:A History of the Software Industry. . 2003
  • 6Christopher Trout.Android Still the Dominant Mobile OS with 1 Billion Active Users. http://www.engadget.com/2014/06/25/google-io-2014-by-the-numbers/ . 2014
  • 7David S.Evans.Economic Aspects of Bitcoins and Other Descentralized Public-Ledger Currency Platforms. The University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law&Economics Paper No.685 .
  • 8Memorandum Opinion,New York v.Microsoft Corp. 224 F.Supp.2d 76 (D.D.C. 2002) .
  • 9David S,Evans.Economics of Vertical Restraints for Multi-Sided Platforms. Competition Policy International . 2013
  • 10David S.Evans.Albert Nichols,and Richard Schmalensee,United States v.Microsoft:Did Consumers Win?. Journal of Competition Law and Economics .

共引文献78

二级引证文献411

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部