期刊文献+

虚假诉讼罪追诉中的证明与证据问题 被引量:3

The Problem of Proof and Evidence in the Prosecution of False Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《刑法修正案(九)》新设虚假诉讼罪,为进一步打击虚假诉讼行为提供了锐利武器。从司法实务看,追诉虚假诉讼罪,需要有相应技术指引。公安司法机关在证据运用时,既需要精细化的刑法解释,也受制于刑事诉讼程序结构,以及现行民事诉讼程序的具体运作。目前应当坚持在一般情况下,由公安机关对虚假诉讼罪行使立案侦查权;但其应进一步提升自身办案能力并加强相关制度建设;同时,在刑事立案条件的把握上,可以在一定程度上弱化"刑事责任"的意义,以破解该罪追诉程序之困。 The new false litigation crime in Amendment IX of the Criminal Law provides a sharp weapon for further cracking down on false litigation.From the view of judicial practice,it is necessary to have specific technical guidance to prosecute the crime of false litigation.The prosecution should prove all the elements of the false litigation crime when they are carrying out the activities of proof.It is needed to interpretate the criminal law fine,and it is also subject to the structure of the criminal procedure and the concrete operation of the current civil procedure.Under the current circumstances in China,we should adhere to the right of public security organs to make a case investigation in a general case,but it should further strengthen its capacity and system construction.At the same time,in order to grasp the conditions of criminal case,the meaning of criminal responsibility can be weakened,so as to solve the difficulties of the procedure of the prosecution.
作者 夏永全 杜玲莎 XIA Yongquan;DU Lingsha(School of Law,School of Intellectual Property Rights,Xihua University,Chengdu Sichuan 610039,China;Chengdu Survey and Design Research Institute,China Electrical Construction Group,Ltd.,Chengdu Sichuan 610000,China)
出处 《河南警察学院学报》 2019年第1期84-93,共10页 Journal of Henan Police College
关键词 虚假诉讼罪 证明 证据 程序困境 false litigation crime proof evidence procedural dilemma
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献78

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部