期刊文献+

顺铂加卡培他滨与顺铂加氟尿嘧啶诱导化疗对局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效比较 被引量:8

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus capecitabine versus cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比PX方案(顺铂+卡培他滨)或PF方案(顺铂+氟尿嘧啶)作为诱导化疗方案治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的效果,评价PX方案的优劣和可行性。方法Ⅲ~Ⅳa期鼻咽癌患者246例随机分配到PX组和PF组,各123例。分别采用PX方案和PF方案进行2周期诱导化疗。两组均进行顺铂3周方案同期放化疗,共2~3周期。评价两组的疗效和不良反应。结果两组的3年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为83.2%(95%CI:74.8~91.6),80.3%(95%CI:72.1~88.5),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);总生存率(OS)分别为92.4%(95%CI:85.9~98.9),91.1%(95%CI:85.0~97.2),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。最常见的3~4级不良反应为粒细胞减少。PX方案皮肤反应增多,经处理可以缓解。结论 PX方案诱导化疗+同期放化疗的疗效不劣于PF诱导化疗+同期放化疗,不良反应可以耐受。 Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes and adverse effects of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus capecitabine(PX regimen) through compare to induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil(PF regimen) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC). Methods Stage III-IVa NPC patients were randomized allocated to PX or PF group. The induction chemotherapy regimen in PX group was cisplatin(80 mg/m^2 d1) plus capecitabine(1 000 mg/m^2, twice a day, d1-14), while in PF group was cisplatin(80 mg/m^2 d1) plus fluorouracil(800 mg/m^2/day, continuous intravenous 120 h). After two cycles of induction chemotherapy(every 3 weeks), patients in both groups received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin(100 mg/m^2 d1, every 3 weeks). Clinical outcomes and adverse effects were compared between the two groups. Results Between January 1, 2015 and March 1, 2017, 246 patients were enrolled in trial, 123 in each group. The progress-free survivals(PFSs) were 83.2%(95% CI: 74.8-91.6) and 80.3%(95% CI: 72.1-88.5) in PX group and PF group, respectively. The overall survivals(OSs) were 92.4%(95% CI: 85.9-98.9) and 91.1%(95% CI: 85.0-97.2) in PX group and PF group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Neutropenia was the most common Grade 3-4 adverse event. Conclusion PX regimen as induction chemotherapy for locally advanced NPC patients is not inferiority than PF regimen with tolerable adverse events.
作者 齐斌 徐稳深 尹文晶 刘锦全 陈冬平 余意 李铭仪 李洲宇 何璐 林铃 黄中 QI Bin;XU Wen-shen;YIN Wen-jing;LIU Jin-quan;CHEN Dong-ping;YU Yi;LI Ming-yi;LI Zhou-yu;HE Lu;LIN Ling;HUANG Zhong(Radiation Oncology Department,the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510095 ,Guangdong,China)
出处 《广东医学》 CAS 2019年第3期374-378,共5页 Guangdong Medical Journal
基金 广州医科大学科学科研项目(编号:2014A44) 广州医科大学博士启动基金资助项目(编号:2010C10) 广州市中医药和中西医结合科技项目(编号:20152A011021)
关键词 鼻咽癌 诱导化疗 卡培他滨 顺铂 氟尿嘧啶 nasopharyngeal carcinoma induction chemotherapy capecitabine cisplatin fluorouracil
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1张瑜,潘建基,洪金省,郑茁,杨凌,林祥松.鼻咽癌患者综合治疗远期疗效的前瞻性研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(6):456-459. 被引量:5
  • 2O' Sullivan B. Nasopharynx cancer: therapeutic value of chemoradiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007,69 (2 Suppl) :$118-121.
  • 3Teo P M, Kwan W H, Lee W Y, et al. Prognosticators determining survival subsequent to distant metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1996,77(12):2423-31.
  • 4Hong M H, Mai H Q, Min H Q, et al. A comparison of the Chinese 1992 and fifth-edition International Union Against Cancer staging systems for staging nasopharyngeal carcinoma [ J ]. Cancer, 2000,89 (2): 242-247.
  • 5Banjat B, Audry H, Bourhis J, et al. Chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis of eight randomized trials and 1753 patients [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,64( 1 ) :47-56.
  • 6韩露,林少俊,潘建基,陈传本,张瑜,张秀春,廖希一,陈奇松.305例鼻咽癌调强放疗预后因素分析[J].癌症,2010,29(2):153-158. 被引量:89
  • 7冯梅,范子煊,黎杰,张鹏,李涛,文浩,王捷,王建,王冀川,王卫东,郎锦义.582例鼻咽癌调强放疗5年远期疗效及预后分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20(5):369-373. 被引量:57
  • 8马骏,麦海强,莫浩元,卢泰祥,崔念基,洪明晃.鼻咽癌放射治疗失败原因分析[J].癌症,2000,19(11):1016-1018. 被引量:134

共引文献31

同被引文献73

引证文献8

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部