期刊文献+

我国法官惩戒事由检视与完善

原文传递
导出
摘要 本轮司法改革中,以法官惩戒为核心的司法责任制被定位为“牛鼻子”的重要地位。当前,我国法官惩戒事由在立法规定和司法实践中呈现出了“散”、“偏”、“泛”、“乱”四大问题,不利于发挥惩戒事由引导、警示、惩罚和保护法官的应有制度价值。对此,本文建议将惩戒事由制定权限定于宪法、法律和最高法院三个层级,建立以不当行为为核心的惩戒事由体系,减少兜底性惩戒事由的规定。
作者 余德厚
出处 《特区法坛》 2018年第12期24-29,共6页 Judicial Forum of Hainan Higher people's court
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献38

  • 1quoted from Sarnbhav N Sankar, Disciplining the Professional Judge, 88 California Law Review 1233,1241 (July 2000).
  • 2Nixon v. United States,113 S Ct. 732, (1993).
  • 3Molly McDonough, Bench Battle Become Vocal , 89 ABA Journal, 20 (May 2003).
  • 4Peter Ryan, Cousels, Councils and Lunch: Preventing Abuse of the Power to Appoint Independent Counsels, 144 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2537 ( June 96).
  • 5Mark Hansen ,Judicial Tightrope, 83 ABA Journal 105 (April 97).
  • 6Model Code of Judicial Conduct, 2000 Edition, Cannon 2A, Commentary.
  • 7Leslie W Abramson, Appearance of Impropriety: Deciding When a Judge' s Impartiality' Might Resonable Be Questioned', 14 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 55 ( Fall 2000).
  • 8Thomas L Jipping,A History of Judicial Impeachment,Washington Times, March 25, 1997.
  • 9Dennis Shea , Impeaching Abusive Judges, Policy Review, Issue 83, 62 (May/Jun 97).
  • 10Model Code of Judicial Conduct pmbl. (1990).

共引文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部