期刊文献+

多学科协作在老年人髋部骨折治疗中的作用 被引量:41

Clinical significance of multidisciplinary team collaboration for the treatment of hip fractures in the elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨多学科团队协作的治疗模式在老年人髋部骨折治疗过程中的作用。方法收集2015年9月1日至2017年12月31日我院骨科收治的符合入组条件的老年髋部骨折患者157例,采取随机分组方法分为传统治疗组和多学科协作(MDT)治疗组,比较两组患者治疗时间、费用、术后转归及术后Harris髋关节功能评分等方面的差异。结果MDT治疗组患者的术前待床日、总住院时间、术后抗生素使用时间较传统治疗组均明显缩短(均P<0.05),治疗总费用、床位费、化验费、护理费较传统治疗组低(均P<0.05)。MDT治疗组患者术后下床活动时间较传统治疗组患者明显提前,股骨颈骨折患者平均为(5.36±1.56)d,优于传统治疗组(10.07±2.26)d;股骨粗隆间骨折患者平均为(30.26±3.01)d,优于传统治疗组(42.28±3.52)d(t=2.86、2.25,P=0.002、0.017)。MDT治疗组患者术后3个月和6个月Harris髋关节功能评分均较传统治疗组高(均P<0.05)。结论MDT治疗模式能缩短老年髋部骨折患者的术前待床日、总住院时间、术后下床活动时间,以及减少住院费用及术后并发症的发生,较传统模式更有利于患者髋关节功能的恢复。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of multidisciplinary team collaboration(MDT)for the treatment of hip fractures in elderly patients. Methods A total of 157 elderly patients with hip fractures meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were admitted into our department from 1st September 2015 to 31st December 2017.The patients were randomly divided into the traditional treatment group and the MDT group.The differences in treatment time, cost, postoperative outcomes and postoperative Harris hip function score were compared between the two groups. Results The preoperative length of stay, total hospitalization time and the time of antibiotic use after operation were shorter in the MDT treatment group than in the traditional treatment group(all P<0.05). Total costs of treatment and costs for bed, laboratory examinations, and nursing were lower in the MDT treatment group than in the traditional treatment group(all P<0.05). The off-bed activity time after operation was earlier in the MDT treatment group with femoral neck fractures [(5.36±1.56)d vs.(10.07±2.26)d, P=0.002]than in the traditional treatment group with intertrochanteric fracture patients [(30.26±3.01)d vs.(42.28±3.52)d, P=0.017]. Harris hip function score was higher in the MDT treatment group than in the traditional treatment group at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusions As compared with the traditional treatment mode, MDT treatment mode can shorten the preoperative stay in bed, the length of hospital stay after surgery and the off-bed activity time after operation, reduce hospitalization costs and postoperative complications, and can promote the recovery of hip joint function in elderly hip fracture patients.
作者 吴小宁 张淑云 彭聪 沈翔 Wu Xiaoning;Zhang Shuyun;Peng Cong;Shen Xiang(Second Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China)
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期283-287,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
基金 长沙市科技计划项目专项资金(kql606002)。
关键词 髋骨折 多学科协作 Hip fractures Multidisciplinary team collaboration
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献85

  • 1高英丽,朱京慈.颅脑损伤后应激性溃疡的发病机制及预防[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(6):478-479. 被引量:65
  • 2钟天安,王建奇,姚鹏飞,徐越,贾军,张浚.重型颅脑损伤后应激性溃疡防治与胃肠道感染的相关性及对策[J].中华神经医学杂志,2006,5(8):823-825. 被引量:36
  • 3SMITH- PETERSEN M, CAVE E, VANGORDER G. Intracapsular fractures of the neck of the femur: treatment by inte,'nal fixatlon[J]. Arehives of Surgery, 1931, 23 (5) : 715 -759.
  • 4MIYAMOTO RG, KAPIAN KM, LEVINE BR, et al. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence - based review of the literature. I: Femoral neck fractures[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2008,16 (10) :596 -607.
  • 5Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, et al. Ambulatory ability after hip fracture: a prospective study ira geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995(310): 150-159.
  • 6Bonar SK, Tinetti ME, Speechley M, et al. Factors associated with short-versus long-term skilled nursing facility placement among community-living hip fracture patients. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1990, 38: 1139-1144.
  • 7Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, et al. Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984 (186) : 45-56.
  • 8Hall SF. A user's guide to selecting a comorbidity index for clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006, 59: 849-855.
  • 9Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Evaluating eomorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol, 2010, 11: 203-209.
  • 10Davenport DL, Bowe EA, Henderson WG, et al. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk factors can be used to validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA PS)levels. Ann Surg, 2006, 243: 636-644.

共引文献1320

同被引文献368

引证文献41

二级引证文献224

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部