期刊文献+

简易精神状态检查评分正常的脑外伤患者行为记忆测评分析 被引量:20

Behavioral Memory Assessment for Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Normal Result in Mini-Mental State Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察简易精神状态检查(MMSE)测评得分正常的脑外伤患者在蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和Rivermead行为记忆测评(RBMT-3)中的表现。方法 2015年3月至2018年6月,选择有明确主诉,但MMSE筛查为认知功能正常的脑外伤患者40例(患者组),以及同期健康体检者30例(对照组),先后采用MMSE、MoCA和RBMT-3进行测试。结果患者组中14例MoCA评分正常。患者组MoCA总分、RBMT-3总粗分和总量表分均明显低于对照组(t>2.822, P <0.01);MoCA言语和延迟回忆分均明显低于对照组(t> 2.790, P <0.01),RBMT-3各项中故事延迟回忆、技能学习即时回忆和技能学习延迟回忆粗分和分量表分均低于对照组(t> 2.507, P <0.05),RBMT-3记住姓名延迟回忆和故事即时回忆粗分低于对照组(t> 2.018, P <0.05)。结论对存在明确主诉的脑外伤患者,建议联合使用MMSE和MoCA进行筛查,记忆损害症状明显的可进一步采用RBMT-3进行评定。 Objective To observe the performance of the traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with normal results in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test-3 (RBMT-3). Methods From March, 2015 to June, 2018, 40 TBI patients with cognitive complaints but normally in MMSE and other 30 healthy persons (controls) were assessed with MoCA and RBMT-3. Results There were 14 patients sounded normally in MoCA. The scores of MoCA, as well as both the raw score and scale score of RBMT-3, were less in the patients than in the controls (t > 2.822, P < 0.01), especially in the verbal and delayed recall subtests of MoCA (t > 2.790, P < 0.01), and delayed story recall, skill learning instant recall, delayed skills recall (both raw and scale scores)(t > 2.507, P < 0.05), and remember name delay recall and story instant recall (raw score only)(t > 2.018, P < 0.05) of RBMT-3. Conclusion For TBI patients with cognitive complaints, it is necessary to assesse with both MMSE and MoCA. If there is any memory impairment, RBMT-3 is needed.
作者 张一 张瑜 王涯 谢凡 姚秋近 ZHANG Yi;ZHANG Yu;WANG Ya;XIE Fan;YAO Qiu-jin(Department of Rehabilitation, Changzhou First People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China)
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期294-297,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 脑外伤 认知 简易精神状态检查 蒙特利尔认知评估量表 Rivermead行为记忆量表 traumatic brain injury cognition Mini-Mental State Examination Montreal Cognitive Assessment Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Hayward P. Traumatic brain injury: the signature of modern con- flicts[ J]. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7 (3) :200-201.
  • 2De Luca R, Calabrb RS, Gervasi G, et al. Is computer-assisted training effective in improving rehabilitative outcomes after brain injury? A case-control hospital-based study[ J]. Disabil Health J, 2014, 7(3) :356-360.
  • 3Li K, Robertson J, Ramos J, et al. Computer-based cognitive retraining for adults with chronic acquired brain injury: a pilot study[J]. Occup Ther Health Care, 2013, 27(4) :333-344.
  • 4Ihara M, OkamatoY, Takahashi R. Suitability of the Montreal cognitive assessement versus the mini-mental state examination in detecting vascular cognitive impairment [ J ]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013, 22(6) :737-741.
  • 5Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, et al. Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease [J]. Neurology, 2009, 73(21):1738-1745.
  • 6Pendlebury ST, Markwick A, de Jager CA, et al. Differences in cognitive profile between TIA, stroke and elderly memory research subjects: a comparison of the MMSE and MoCA[ J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 34(1):48-54.
  • 7Pendlebury ST, Mariz J, Bull L, et al. MoCA, ACE-R, and MMSE versus the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards Neuropsychological Battery after TIA and stroke[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(2) :464-469.
  • 8Shiroky JS, Schipper HM, Berg'man H, et al. Can you have de- mentia with an MMSE score of 30.9 [J]. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Deman, 2007, 22(5 ):406-415.
  • 9Wong GK, Lam SW, Wong A, et al. MoCA-assessed cognitive function and excellent outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at 1 year[ J]. Eur J Neurol, 2014, 21 (5) :725-730.
  • 10Sunderland A, Harris J, Baddeley AD. Do laboratory tests predict ev- eryday memory? A neuropsychological study [J]. J Verbal Learning Ver- bal Beha, 1983, 22(7): 341-357.

共引文献61

同被引文献188

引证文献20

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部