期刊文献+

中国城区妇女孕期增重适宜值研究 被引量:8

Optimal gestational weight gain for Chinese urban women
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中国妇女孕期体重增长适宜值。方法选取2013年1月—2016年5月于武汉市加入同济母婴健康队列(TMCHC)的单胎足月产孕妇6998人,于孕8~16周问卷调查了解其社会人口学、既往病史等资料并测量体重及身高。分娩前测量产前体重;分娩后通过医院记录收集分娩孕周、分娩方式、妊娠合并症、新生儿性别、出生体重及身长等信息。采用限制性三次样条回归模型分别拟合孕期增重与小于胎龄儿、大于胎龄儿、低出生体重、巨大儿、剖宫产、妊娠高血压及妊娠期糖尿病发生率关系曲线,寻找各妊娠结局发生率均较低的增重范围作为同济推荐值。将孕期增重的P25~P75作为百分位数法孕期增重推荐值。采用Logistic回归模型,分别以同济和百分位数法推荐孕期增重适宜值为参照,分析孕期增重过多或不足对不良妊娠结局的影响。结果 (1)不同孕前体质指数组各种不良妊娠结局发生率较低的孕期增重范围分别为:低体重组12.0~17.0 kg、正常体重组9.0~14.0 kg、超重组7.0~11.0 kg,以此作为孕期增重的同济推荐值。百分位数法孕期增重推荐值分别为:孕前低体重组14.0~19.0 kg、正常体重组13.0~19.0 kg、超重组10.8~18.0 kg及肥胖组9.0~15.8 kg。(2)与同济增重适宜组相比,增重过多组发生不良妊娠结局的风险分别为大于胎龄儿(OR=2.94,95%CI 2.31~3.73)、巨大儿(OR=3.13,95%CI 2.38~4.13)、剖宫产(OR=1.53,95%CI 1.38~1.71)及妊娠高血压(OR=2.18,95%CI 1.50~3.17);增重不足组发生的风险为小于胎龄儿(OR=1.82,95%CI 1.32~2.53)。按百分位数法推荐值分组,相应的风险值分别为大于胎龄儿(OR=2.11,95%CI 1.76~2.54)、巨大儿(OR=2.16,95%CI 1.76~2.65)、剖宫产(OR=1.53,95%CI 1.36~1.72)、妊娠高血压(OR=1.39,95%CI 1.02~1.90)及小于胎龄儿(OR=1.60,95%CI 1.29~1.98)。结论推荐中国孕妇孕期增重分别为:孕前低体重者12.0~17.0 kg、正常体重者9.0~14.0 kg及超重者7.0~11.0 kg。 OBJECTIVE To examine optimal gestational weight gain(GWG)for Chinese pregnant women.METHODS A total of 6998 women with singleton and term pregnancy recruited to the Tongji Maternal and Child Health Cohort during January 2013 to May 2016 in Wuhan,Hubei were included.Information on sociodemographic,medical and family history of disease was obtained by questionnaire,body weight and height were measured at the first antenatal care during 8-16 weeks of gestation.Prenatal weight of mothers were measured,and gestational week,mode of delivery,pregnancy complications,gender of newborn,birth weight and length were collected from medical records after delivery.Restricted cubic spline was used to model nonlinear relationships between GWG and the occurrence of small for gestational age(SGA),large for gestational age(LGA),low birth weight(LBW),macrosomia,cesarean,gestational hypertension(GH)and gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM),respectively.The GWG of the lowest risks for adverse pregnant outcomes was regarded as optimal GWG recommended by Tongji(TJ)for pregnant women.The P25-P75 of GWG was defined as the optimal GWG recommended by percentile method.Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of excessive or insufficient GWG on adverse pregnancy outcomes,while the recommendations of TJ and percentile method were used as references,respectively.RESULTS(1)The GWG with lower risk of adverse pregnant outcomes based on pre-gravid body mass index(BMI)are 12.0-17.0 kg for underweight,9.0-14.0 kg for normal weight and 7.0-011.kg for overweight,respectively,which are defined as TJ recommendations.The recommended GWG by percentile method are 14.0-19.0 kg for underweight,13.0-19.0 kg for normal weight,10.8-18.0 kg for overweight and 9.0-15.8 kg for obesity,respectively.(2)Compared to women gain within the TJ recommendations,OR of LGA is 2.94(95%CI 2.31-3.73),macrosomia is 3.13(95%CI 2.38-4.13),cesarean is 1.53(95%CI 1.38-1.71)and GH is 2.18(95%CI 1.50-3.17)for those with excessive GWG,OR of SGA is 1.82(95%CI 1.32-2.53)for those who gain less.The corresponding ORs according to percentile method are 2.11(95%CI 1.76-2.54)for LGA,2.16(95%CI 1.76-2.65)for macrosomia,1.53(95%CI 1.36-1.72)for cesarean,1.39(95%CI 1.02-1.90)for GH and 1.60(95%CI 1.29-1.99)for SGA,respectively.CONCLUSION The optimal GWG of Chinese pregnant women recommended by the study are 12.0-17.0 kg for pre-gravid underweight women,9.0-14.0 kg for normal weight women and 7.0-11.0 kg for overweight,respectively.
作者 钟春蓉 陈仁娟 周雪贞 张玉 黄莉 李倩 徐上知 陈曦 高芹 刘超群 吴江越 李夏婷 崔文丽 孙国强 熊国平 倪泽敏 杨雪锋 郝丽萍 杨红英 杨年红 Zhong Chunrong;Chen Renjuan;Zhou Xuezhen;Zhang Yu;Huang Li;Li Qian;Xu Shangzhi;Chen Xi;Gao Qin;Liu Chaoqun;Wu Jiangyue;Li Xiating;Cui Wenli;Sun Guoqiang;Xiong Guoping;Ni Zemin;Yang Xuefeng;Hao Liping;Yang Hongying;Yang Nianhong(Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene,School of Public Health,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science,Wuhan 430030,China;Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Wuhan 430070,China;the Central Hospital of Wuhan,Wuhan 430014,China;Jiangan Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Wuhan 430014,China;Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《卫生研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期193-199,共7页 Journal of Hygiene Research
基金 科技基础性工作专项(No.2013FY114200)
关键词 孕期增重 孕前体质指数 妊娠结局 gestational weight gain pre-gravid body mass index pregnant outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1周北凡,武阳丰,李莹,张林峰.中国成人代谢综合征腰围切点的研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(1):81-85. 被引量:81
  • 2李立明,饶克勤,孔灵芝,姚崇华,向红丁,翟凤英,马冠生,杨晓光,中国居民营养与健康状况调查技术执行组.中国居民2002年营养与健康状况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(7):478-484. 被引量:1779
  • 3武阳丰,马冠生,胡永华,李艳平,李贤,崔朝辉,陈春明,孔灵芝.中国居民的超重和肥胖流行现状[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(5):316-320. 被引量:567
  • 4张红叶,杨军,周北凡,武阳丰,李莹,陶寿淇.我国十组人群脑卒中危险因素的前瞻性研究[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1996,4(4):150-152. 被引量:91
  • 5周敏,章小维,渠川琰,兰红霞,陈奕,黄醒华,李智,冯清燕,陈咏玫.妊娠期适宜增重范围与出生体重的关系研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(4):275-277. 被引量:78
  • 6王濒贞.实用妇产科学(第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1987.123-126.
  • 7曹家琪 连志浩 等.队列(群组)研究.流行病学,第2版,第1卷[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.190-206.
  • 8中国15城市新生儿体格发育科研协作组.我国15城市不同胎龄新生儿体格发育调查研究[J].中华儿科杂志,1988,26(4):206-208.
  • 9Fortes Filho JB, Valiatti FB, Eckert GU, et al. Is being small for gestational age a risk factor for retinopathy of prematurity? A study with 345 very low birth weight preterm infants[ J]. J Pediatr( Rio J), 2009,85 (1):48-54.
  • 10Hong R, Ruiz-Beltran M. Low birth weight as a risk factor for infant mortality in Egypt [ J ]. East Mediterr Health J, 2008,14 (5) :992-1002.

共引文献3671

同被引文献64

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部