期刊文献+

科学资助中的控制权分配——以科学基金机构职能变迁为例 被引量:4

Distribution of controlling powers in scientific research funding: Based on an analysis of function change of selected research funding agencies
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过借鉴不完全契约理论拓展了委托代理模型,指出在科学资助过程中存在目标设定权、资源配置权和绩效监督权三种基本权力。三种权力在委托方、管理方和执行方之间的配置方式形成了不同类型的科学资助组织模式,导致不同类型的科学资助机构。基于这一分析框架,本文对国外科学资助机构职能设置和组织制度变迁进行总体性描述,初步检验这一理论的解释力。 Drawing on insights from incomplete contracts theory,the paper expanded the principal-agent model by conceptualizing the allocation of control rights in goal setting,resource allocation and performance supervision among the principal,supervisor and agent.The authors argue that the different modes of scientific research funding and organization setting are derived from the variations in the allocation of control rights.And then,the article illustrates the new theoretical model in a historical review on the function of selected funding organizations.
作者 卢阳旭 龚旭 LU Yang-xu;GONG Xu(Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development,Beijing 100038,China;Bureau of Policy,National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing 100085,China)
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期470-475,525,共7页 Studies in Science of Science
关键词 委托代理 目标设定 资源配置 绩效监督 principal-agent goals setting resource allocation performance supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献71

  • 1苏珊·科岑斯,郝刘祥,袁江洋.二十一世纪科学:自主与责任[J].科学文化评论,2005,2(5):50-64. 被引量:24
  • 2周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):36-50. 被引量:5562
  • 3DE司托克斯著 周春彦 谷春立译.基础科学与技术创新--巴斯德象限[M].北京:科学出版社,1999..
  • 4[1]Barber, B. J. 1962. Science and the Social Order. New York: Collier.
  • 5[2]Bortnick, J. and Miller, N. R. 1986. Scientific and technical information. In Albert H. Teich and Jill H. Pace (eds.), Science and Technology in the USA. London: Longman.
  • 6[3]Brown, J. S. 1995. Contribution in report on: Workshop to Assess Corporate Research Restructuring. National Academy of Sciences.
  • 7[4]Bush, V. 1945. Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington DC: Public Affairs Press.
  • 8[5]Cozzens, S. E. 1990. Autonomy and power in science. In S. E. Cozzens and T. F. Gieryn (eds.),Theories of Science in Society. Bloomington: Indian University Press.
  • 9[6]Cozzens, S. E. and Melkers, J. 1998. Use and usefulness of performance measurement in state science and technology programs. Policy Studies Journal.
  • 10[7]England, J. M. 1983. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation's Formative Years, 1945-57. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

共引文献790

同被引文献43

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部