《石川丈山年谱》勘误一则——《石川文书》“九月廿七日”书简年代再考

The Corrigendum on The Chronicle of Ishikawa Jozan——Re-examination the Date of the September 27^(th)

小川武彦、石岛勇编《石川丈山年谱》,素以资料收集的完备和考索审定的缜密而著称,可谓日本近世前期文坛研究领域的扛鼎之作。年谱卷首载有编者的两篇考证文章。其中一篇详述了丈山的成长经历和各时期的交游概貌。文中多次提到东京大学史料编纂所藏写本《石川文书》所收的一封书信。此信是某年九月二十七日江户林家第二代儒宗林鹅峰投寄给石川丈山的候文手简。但笔者在"九月廿七日"鹅峰书简写作年代的问题上,与小川、石岛二先生持不同观点。该书札的年代推定直接影响丈山及其周边人物的生平考证。基于笔者考辨所得出的结论,可以更为清晰地还原当时文坛交游与书籍出版之间的密切关联。

Ogawa Takehiko and Ishijima Isami compiled The Chronicle of Ishikawa Jozan,which is known for the integration of data collection and meticulous examination.So it can be regarded as a masterpiece in the field of literary research in the early stages of the Edo period in Japan.The chronicle book contains two textual articles by the editor.One of them elaborates on the growth experience of Ishikawa Jozan and his social intercourse of each period.In this article,a letter from The Iiterature of Ishikawa Jozan,which has been collected by Historiographical institute of The University of Tokyo,has been mentioned for many times.This transcript was written by the second generation of the Confucianist Hayashi Gaho of the Edo Rin family on the September 27th of some year.The author held different view with Ogawa Takehiko and Ishijima Isami on the issue of the written time(September 27th)of Hayashi Gaho’s letter.The presumption of the year of this Literature directly affects the biography of Ishikawa Jozan and the research of his surrounding characters.Based on the conclusions drawn by the author,we can restore more clearly the close association between literary exchanges and book publishing.