期刊文献+

奈达功能对等理论与功能主义目的论比较研究 被引量:6

Comparative Study on Nida's Functional Equivalence Theory and Functionalist Skopos Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 奈达的功能对等理论与功能主义目的论两大翻译理论是在不同时期由不同流派提出的,它们之间有其相似之处及不同之处。着重分析两大翻译理论在理论基础、原文及译者地位、翻译原则及标准、文化方向、文本功能及各自优缺点六大层面上的差异性,并分析其共性,旨在使人们对两大翻译理论的理解更加透彻,同时会在不同的翻译情境下选择适当的翻译理论,以便更好地指导翻译实践。 Eugene A. Nida’s functional theory and functionalist Skopos theory are two main translation theories which were put forward by different translation schools in different period. They have some differences and similarities. This paper makes a comparative study on the two theories’ differences in terms of theoretical foundation, criterion and rule for translation, culture orientation, textual function, merits and demerits, and similarities. The aim is to make us have a deep understanding of the theories and to use them appropriately in different translation contexts, letting the two theories guide us well in translation practice.
作者 范德瑞 FAN Derui(Dept. of English,Shanxi Normal University Linfen College,Linfen 041000,China)
出处 《淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版)》 2019年第4期66-69,共4页 Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 功能对等理论 目的论 奈达 功能主义 functional equivalence theory Skopos theory Nida functionalism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献7

  • 1Nord, Christiane. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis [M]. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi, [1988] 1991.
  • 2Nord, Christiane. Scopos, loyalty and translational conventions [J]. Target, 1991,3 (1): 91-109.
  • 3Nord, Christiane. 1992. Text analysis in translator training[A]. Cay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard. Teaching Translation and Interpreting. Selected Papers of the First Language International Conference, Elsinore [C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1994. 39-48.
  • 4Nord, Christine. Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained [M]. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 1997.
  • 5Reiss, Katharina. Translation Criticism: The Potentials and Limitations: Categories and Criteria for Translation Quality Assessment (translated by: Erroll E Rhodes) [M]. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, [1971] 2000.
  • 6Reiss, Katharina. Pragmatic aspects of translation [J]. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1987, 13 (2): 47-59.
  • 7Vermeer, Hans J. (1989b) Skopos and commission in translational action [A]. Andrew Chesterman. Readings in Translation [C]. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura Ab, 1989. 173-187.

共引文献208

同被引文献53

引证文献6

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部