期刊文献+

国际仲裁中第三方出资的披露问题研究 被引量:4

Study on Disclosure of Third Party Funding in International Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,第三方出资因其有助于保障经济弱势方的救济权,在国际仲裁中广为使用。为规制第三方出资行为、保障仲裁程序公正,应当对第三方出资信息予以披露。其中披露涉及仲裁员和受资助者两个主体:仲裁规则应将仲裁员与第三方出资者的关系纳入披露范围,若仲裁员恶意不履行披露义务,仲裁员应承担民事或纪律责任,裁决也可能被撤销;同时应在仲裁规则中明确受资助者的强制披露义务,即尽早向当事人和仲裁庭披露第三方出资的存在及身份,特定情形下向仲裁庭披露第三方出资协议。我国现有规则对第三方出资的披露规定尚不完善,因而有必要在《仲裁法》中明确仲裁员的披露义务,在仲裁规则中规定仲裁员和受资助者对第三方出资信息的披露义务。 In recent years,third party funding(TPF)has been widely applied in international arbitration due to its importance to protectthe right of relief of the economically disadvantaged parties. The disclosure of TPF is necessary to regulate itself and ensure procedural fairness. Both arbitrators and the funded party should disclose relevant information. On the one hand,arbitrators should disclose the relationship with the third party funder which may arise doubts about their impartiality and independence. This obligation should be incorporated in arbitration rules,in case the arbitrator fails the disclosure obligation deliberately where he or she shall bear civil or disciplinary responsibility,and the award may be revoked as well. On the other hand,mandatory disclosure obligation of the funded party shall be stipulated in the arbitration rules,which is,to disclose the existence and identity of TPF to the parties and the tribunal as soon as possible,and to disclose TPF agreements to the tribunal in specific circumstances. In China,since the regulations of TPF is not sound,it’s essential to legalize the arbitrator’s disclosure obligations in arbitration law. Arbitration institutions should also clarify that arbitrators are obliged to disclose its relationship with the funders and the funded party shall disclose TPF information.
作者 陆莹 Lu Ying
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《北京仲裁》 2018年第4期216-236,共21页 Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词 国际仲裁 第三方出资 披露 透明度 international arbitration third party funding disclosure transparency
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献55

  • 1阎铁毅,梁淑妍.关于仲裁员责任制度的思考[J].中国海商法年刊,2002,14(1):290-298. 被引量:11
  • 2Amina Rustamova. Neutrality of arbitrators [ J ]. Central Eu- ropean University Aprill0. 2009. p. 1.
  • 3Ressel Murray. Arbitrator and Mediator Disclosure Obli- gations in Colorado[J]. The Colorado Lawyer/September 2005/vol. 34. No. 9/53.
  • 4David V. Snyder. Private Lawmaking [ J ]. Ohio State Law Journal. 2003. p. 410.
  • 5David. Caron Lee M. Caplan Matti Pellonpiiii. The UNCI- TRAL Arbitration Rules A Commentary[ M]. Oxford Uni- versity Press, First published 2006, p21.
  • 6Alan Redfern And Martin Hunter, Law and Practice of In- ternational Commercial Arbitration[ M]. Fourth Edition,(2(104), Sweet and Maxwell,p82.
  • 7lYres Derains and Eric A. Schwartz, A Guide To The ICC Rules of Arbitration [ M ]. Kluwer Law International 2005 (Second Edition) , p135.
  • 8Anne K. Hoffmann, Duty of Disclosure and Challenge of Arbitrators :The Standard Applicable Under the New IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest and the German Ap- proach [ J ]. Arbitration International, Vol. 21 No. 3 (2005) ,427 - 436.
  • 9[瑞典]费恩·迈德森.瑞典商事仲裁[M].李虎,顾华宁,译.北京:法律出版社,2008:91.
  • 10Buys C G. The Tensions Between Confidentiality and Transparency in International Arbitration[ J]. Am. Rev. Intl Arb. , Vol. 14,2003:121.

共引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部