摘要
专业陪审员制度的性质与普通陪审员截然不同,对当事人处分权与辩论权的侵犯和职权主义倾向带来的诉讼结构偏斜与当今民事领域发展方向背道而驰。同时,其对鉴定制度的补充和代替实际上已经造成了对鉴定制度发展的阻碍。我们应该以构建鉴定制度为基础,以构建专业法庭、吸收专业人员为临时法官为过渡来开辟我国认定专门问题的制度进路。
The expert juror system and the ordinary juror system are entirely different in the nature. The infringement of the parties’ right to dispose and the right to debate, and the tendency of inquisitorial system lead to the deviation of the litigation structure, which runs counter to the direction of the development of civil field today. At the same time, the supplement and substitution of the judicial identification system has actually hindered the its development. We should base on the construction of the judicial identification system, and take the construction of the specialized court and the absorption of the professionals as temporary judges as the transition to explore the system path to the determination of special problems in China.
作者
程飞飞
CHENG Fei-fei(Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300380)
出处
《集宁师范学院学报》
2019年第1期68-71,共4页
Journal of Jining Normal University
关键词
专业陪审员
鉴定制度
诉讼结构
对抗性
Expert juror
judicial identification system
litigation structure
antagonism