期刊文献+

我国散发型克-雅病失能等级及权重初步评定

Assessment of disability level and weight of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease cases in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评定我国散发型克–雅病(sCJD)的失能等级及权重。方法以六级社会功能分级标准制定我国sCJD失能分级标准,通过德尔菲法、专家视觉模拟评分法(VAS)获取失能权重。结果德尔菲法得到sCJD平均失能权重为0.920,专家VAS得到sCJD失能权重中位数为0.850。结论 sCJD患者健康状况差、失能权重高,应给予相应的社会关注,加大朊病毒领域研究,以早日获得防治方法。 Objective To evaluate the disability level and weight of the sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease(sCJD)cases in China.Methods Two ways were used to obtain disability weight of the sCJD cases in China.One was Delphi method,another one was the expert assessment of visual analogue scale(VAS).Results The mean disability weight of the 180 sCJD patients was 0.920,which was calculated based on the standard disability level obtained by Delphi method.The median disability weight of the sCJD cases from expert assessment of VAS was 0.850.Conclusion The results indicated that the sCJD patients were in poor health with high disability weight.It is necessary to paid special attention to them and strengthen the research in the field of prion diseases to facilitate the prevention and treatment of the disease.
作者 张丽娜 王园 谢姆斯耶.吾拉因 肖康 王晶 周伟 石琦 高晨 Zhang Lina;Wang Yuan;Wulayin Xiemusiye;Xiao Kang;Wang Jing;Zhou Wei;Shi Qi;Gao Chen(State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Preventionand Control,National Institute for Viral Disease Prevention and Control,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 102206,China)
出处 《疾病监测》 CAS 2019年第2期122-126,共5页 Disease Surveillance
关键词 朊病毒 克-雅病 失能权重 德尔菲法 视觉模拟评分法 Prion Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Disability weight Delphi method Visual analogue scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献78

  • 1李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:474
  • 2刘伟涛,顾鸿,李春洪.基于德尔菲法的专家评估方法[J].计算机工程,2011,37(S1):189-191. 被引量:185
  • 3邢禾,何广学,刘剑君.德尔菲法筛选结核病防治知识调查指标的研究与预试验评价[J].中国健康教育,2006,22(2):91-95. 被引量:78
  • 4杨敬,沈清,雷通海,汪祥辉,韩晓军,陈定湾,刘谷琮.浙江省主要恶性肿瘤失能权重评定[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(8):931-933. 被引量:7
  • 5Murray CJL, Lopez AD, Jamison DT. The global burden of disease in 1990 :summary results, sensitivity analysis and future directions[R]. Bull WHO, 1994 ; 72 ( 3 ) :495-509.
  • 6郭秀花.医学现场调查技术与统计分析[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:286-294.
  • 7Millar G. The development of indicators for sustainable tourism:resuits of a Delphi survey of tourism researchers[ J]. Tourism Management,2002,22:351 - 362.
  • 8Snyder-Halpem R, Thompson CB, Schaffer J. Comparison of mailed vs. Internet applications of the Delphi technique in clinical informatics research [ J ]. Proc AMIA Syrup,2000,6:809 - 813.
  • 9Moussa A, Bridges - Webb C. Quality of care in general practice : a Delphi study of indicators and methods [ J ]. Aust Fam Physician, 1994,23:465 - 468,472 - 473.
  • 10Gallagher M, Bradshaw C, Nattress H. Policy priorities in diabetes care : a Delphi study [ J ]. Qual Health Care, 1996,5:3 - 8.

共引文献427

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部