期刊文献+

基于死亡率免疫理论的自然对冲有效性评估

The Effectiveness of Natural Hedging Using Mortality Immunization Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 为应对长寿风险对年金产品的影响,本文提出分段对冲策略,并以死亡率免疫和死亡率久期规则为理论基础探讨该策略的有效性问题。为避免传统久期匹配方法中参数估计误差的累积和传导,借助WinBUGS软件和贝叶斯Markov Chain Monte Carlo方法,在统一的计算框架下完成了死亡率预测、死亡率久期计算和对冲效果的数值模拟;并以4种分段组合准备金数据的三维图、方差缩减比(VRR)和VaR值为指标进行长寿风险对冲有效性的对比,结果表明低年龄寿险保单和高年龄年金保单组合具有最平滑的三维图,最小的VRR和VaR值,可明显提高长寿风险自然对冲的有效性。 To respond to the longevity risk of annuities caused by larger-than-expected mortality improvement,this article assessed the effectiveness of segmented hedging strategy using the theory of mortality immunization and mortality duration as the theoretical basis.In order to avoid the accumulation and transformation of parameter errors,we completed the mortality projection,mortality duration calculation and numerical simulation in the uniform framework of Bayes MCMC method using WinBUGS software.The three-dimensional diagram,variance reduction ratio and VaR of the four segmented combination reserve funds were computed and compared,and the results showed that the combination of low age life policy and older age annuity insurance policy turned out to have the smoothest three-dimensional diagram,the smallest VRR and VaR,and therefore could significantly raise the longevity risk hedging effectiveness.
作者 胡仕强 HU Shi-qiang
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期41-50,共10页 Insurance Studies
关键词 长寿风险 死亡率免疫 分段对冲 贝叶斯MCMC方法 longevity risk mortality immunization segmented hedging Bayes MCMC method
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献54

  • 1Andrew J. G. Cairns, David Blake, Kevin Dowd, A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty : theory and calibration [ J ]. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2006,73 (4) : 687 - 718.
  • 2Etienne Marceau, Patrice Gaillardetz. On life insurance reserves in a stochastic mortality and interest rates en- vironment [ J ]. Insurance : Mathematics and Economics. 1999,25 ( 3 ) : 261 - 280.
  • 3Jeffrey T. Tsai, Jennifer L. Wang, Larry Y. Tzeng. On the optimal product mix in life insurance companies u- sing conditional value at risk [ J]. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics 2010,46( 1 ) :235 - 241.
  • 4John C. Cox,Jonathan E. Ingersoll ,Jr. and Stephen A. Ross. A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates [ J ]. Econometrica, 1985,53 ( 2 ) :385 - 407.
  • 5K. C. Chan, G. Andrew Karolyi, Francis A. Longstate, Anthony B. Sanders. An empirical comparison of alter- native models of the short-Term interest rate [ J]. The Journal of Finance, 1992,47 (3):1209 -1227.
  • 6Milevsky M. A. and Promislow S. D. , Mortality Derivatives and the Option to Annuitise [ J ]. Insurance:Math- ematics and Economics ,2001,29 ( 3 ) :299 - 318.
  • 7Oldrich, Vasicek. An equilibrium characterization of the term structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics 1977,5 (2) : 177 - 188.
  • 8Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S.. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk [ J ]. Journal of Risk, 2000, ( 2 ) : 21 -41.
  • 9Ronald D. Lee, Lawrence R. Cater. Modeling and Forecasting U. S Mortality [ J ]. Journal of the American Sta- tistical Association, 1992,87 (419) :659 - 671.
  • 10Samuel H. Cox, Yijia Lin. Natural hedging of life and annuity mortality risks [ J ]. North American Actuarial Journal, 2007,11 ( 3 ) : 1 - 15.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部