期刊文献+

桓谭的学术立场与政治个性 被引量:1

HUAN Tan's Academic Stance and Political Personality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 桓谭从古文经的学术立场出发,引申出对谶纬符命之学的思想批判,并以此选择对现实政治的态度。从他与王莽的合作到分裂,以至利用《新论》对王莽进行批判,他在东汉前期对光武帝"天下事以图谶决之"的公然反对,都可以看出他是从古文经立场和对谶纬符命之学的否定出发的,学术立场决定了他的政治个性。在和同时代其他经学大家刘歆、贾逵等人的比较中,桓谭对学术真理的追求和持守,显得特别突出。在皇权专制时代,能不屈服于专制君主的淫威,始终如一地坚守学术立场,是桓谭最可宝贵的品格。 From the academic perspective of research on the Old Text Confucian Classics, HUAN Tan made a criticism of the theology on the basis of prophecy, interpretation, images and tokens, and showed his choice on politics. He cooperated at first but ruptured with WANG Mang, and he criticized WANG Mang in his Xin LunCNexv-Comments).In the early period of the Eastern Han Dynasty(25-20), HUAN Tan publicly objected to the Emperor Guangwu's concept that 'all events can be predicted by the prophecy,interpretation,and image and token reading'. All he did originated from his academic perspective and negative attitude to the theology on the basis of prophecy, interpretation, images and tokens. The academic stance decided his political personalities.Compared with other scholars of his times such as LIU Xin and JIA Kui,HUAN Tan pursued and persisted the academic truth, which was rare at that time. In the age dominated by imperial right, HUAN Tan kept his academic stance unremittedly even under the powers of the autocrat,which proves his worshipful'personality.
作者 李振宏 LI Zhenhong(Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001,China)
出处 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期111-128,共18页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词 桓谭 刘歆 王莽 贾逵 古文经 今文经 谶纬 HUAN Tan LIU Xin WANG Mang JIA Kuij the Old Text Confucian Classics the New Text Confucian Classics the theology on the basis of prophecy interpretation images and tokens
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

  • 1苏诚鉴.桓谭与王莽[J].安徽师大学报(哲学社会科学版),1986,14(1):37-44. 被引量:3
  • 2张敬国.安徽含山凌家滩新石器时代墓地发掘简报[J].文物,1989(4):1-9. 被引量:71
  • 3田可文.桓谭其人[J].乐府新声(沈阳音乐学院学报),1991,9(4):20-22. 被引量:1
  • 4苏舆.春秋繁露义证[M].北京:中华书局,1992.180-182.
  • 5王先慎.韩非子集解[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社印世界书局诸子集成本,1986.147.
  • 6钟肇鹏.《谶纬论略》,沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,I992年,第11-26页.
  • 7《四库全书总目》,北京:中华书局,1981年,第47页.
  • 8陈槃.《谶纬释名》[J].国立中央研究院历史语言研究所集刊,1943,11.
  • 9郭沫若.《侈靡篇的研究》,《奴隶制时代》,北京:人民出版社,1973年,第148-201页.
  • 10胡家聪.《侈靡著作时代质疑》,《管子新探》,北京;中国社会科学出版社,1995年,第291-299页.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部