期刊文献+

民商事案件繁简分流机制改革研究

Research on the Reform of the Diversion Mechanism of Civil and Commercial Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在人民日益增长的美好生活需要与不平衡不充分的发展之间的矛盾成为新时期主要矛盾的社会背景下,人民群众对司法工作也提出了更高的要求,十九大会议精神要求在司法领域也应当不断加强改革创新以满足人民群众日益增长的司法需求。随着《最高人民法院关于进一步推进繁简分流优化司法资源配置的若干意见》(以下简称《意见》)的出台,繁简分流改革机制在全国范围内逐步建立,在《意见》原则性规定和总体框架指导下,各地区法院展开了对《意见》实施的具体探索。在落实案件繁简分流机制过程中,应以程序正当化为前提,坚持公平与效率平衡原则,充分尊重当事人选择权并建立多元化矛盾解决机制,从诉讼流程各环节深挖改革空间,细化和创新具体举措,追求审判资源的优化配置和司法效益最大化,准确实现繁简分流的制度内涵和价值。 With the people's growing need for a better life and unbalanced development has become the main contradiction in the new era, people have put forward higher requirements for judicial work. The spirit of the 19th National Congress required that reform and innovation should be continuously strengthened in the judicial field to meet the growing judicial needs of the people. With the promulgation of the Opinions on Further Promoting the Diversion Mechanism and Optimizing Judicial Resources of Supreme People's Court'(hereinafter ,the Opinions), the mechanism reform has been gradually established nationwide. With the guidance of the Opinions, the regional courts launched a specific exploration of the implementation of the Opinions. In the process of implementing the diversion mechanism, it should presuppose the procedural justification, adhere to the principle of fairness and efficiency balance, fully respect the party's choice and establish a diversified contradiction resolution mechanism, so as to expand the reform space from the various aspects of the litigation process and innovate specific measures, to pursue of the optimal allocation of trial resources and the maximization of judicial benefits, and accurately realize the institutional connotation and value of the diversion mechanism.
作者 裴度 Pei Du(Chongqing Beibei People's Court, Chongqing 400700)
出处 《安徽警官职业学院学报》 2019年第1期32-36,共5页 Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词 民商事案件 繁简分流 改革 civil and commercial cases diversion mechanism reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献43

  • 1《法制日报》2001年4月9日题为“政府败诉拒不执行,法院判决如同废纸”.
  • 2贺卫方.《复转军人进法院》[N].南方周末,1998年1月2日.
  • 3.《消费者权益保护法第49条的解释与适用》[N].《人民法院报》,2001年3月29日.
  • 4左卫民等.《合议制度研究》,法律出版社2002年版.
  • 5Harald Koch & Frank Diedlich, Civil Procedure in Germany,C.H.Beck Munchen,1998.p.128.
  • 6拙文.《‘立审分离’管理模式的质疑》.《人民法院报》2001年10月26日.
  • 7[美]理查德·A,波斯纳.《法律的经济分析》下册,蒋兆康译,中国大百科全书出版社1997年版,第717页.
  • 8J.A.Jolowics.Managing Overload in Appellate Courts:"Western "Countries.p.83.
  • 9[日]棚獭孝雄.《纠纷的解决与审判制度》,王亚新译.中国豉法大学出版社1996年版,第112页.
  • 10Peter Gottwald, Civil Justice Reform: Access, Cost, and Expedition. The German Perspective p.220.

共引文献215

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部