王阳明政治经济学批判范畴研究——中西学术对话的方法论议题

A Study on WANG Yangming’s Critique Categories of Political Economy——Methodological Issues of Academic Dialogue between China and the West

从马克思主义出发思考"文化自信",理解场域首先是社会历史,据此可把握中外会通意蕴的马克思与王阳明"思维科学对话",寻求世界科学和中国文化的机理相通。从工作实质性规定看,这恰恰是"中国人的方法论概念"。可以说,这是思维科学线索上中国与世界的"内在相通"。王阳明的著作体现了《道德经》和《资本论》的"跨时空"相遇。从"经济学的文化自信"看,《资本论》的内在写作线索是在历史科学与思维科学高度合一基础上的马克思主义理论科学创制,即出发地是"历史研究"(所谓的"研究方法"),工作落脚点是"理论科学"建构(所谓的"叙述方法");而"王阳明心学"研究与之线索关联、机理相似,尤其是"政治经济学批判"在何种意蕴上作为"思维"以及马克思主义学科工作规定的写法上与之具有高度的相关性。从理论科学建设高度看,这是人类认识的又一次启航,通过各种"思想高地"的比较与综合,建立不同经济形态社会类型的工作融汇与思想对话,以"新时代"为依据,重塑中国社会主义发展的学科范畴。同时按照"经典对话"研究的学术意义来讲,又不啻是一次更大范围内的经济学理论知识"再生产"。它启示:社会主义市场经济必须基于"主体社会""客体社会"两个规定层面进行"思维取象",以利于建立对"资本"进行历史扬弃的"批判的知识理论"。

A Marxist inspection of “Cultural Confidence” means that the understanding of field is in the first place a social history. Thus, we can grasp the “Dialogue of Thinking Science” between Marx and WANG Yangming, representing Western and Chinese philosophy respectively, and seek for a connection between them. Viewed from the working substantive provisions, this is precisely the “Chinese conception of methodology”. It can be regarded as an internal communication between China and the world about the science of thinking. WANG Yangming’s works represent an encounter of Tao Te Ching and Capital over time and space. Viewed from “Culture Confidence in Economics”, the intrinsic writing clues of Capital are of Marxist theoretical initia-tion, based on a high integration of the science of history and the science of thinking. Its starting point is historical research (the so-called “research methodology”) and the foothold is the theoretical construction (the so-called “narration methodology”). WANG Yangming’s “Mentality Science” has same or similar research routes and mechanism, and his “critique of political economy” is especially highly correlated to Marxist core methodological principles and disciplines. From the perspective of theoretical science construction, it is another human “knowledge odyssey”. A comparison and integration of various “thought highlands” helps construct a practical operation and ideological dialogue in different social and economic forms. New Chinese socialist discipline categories can be remodeled on the basis the “New Era”. Meanwhile, it is a “knowledge reproduction” of economic theory on a larger scale, according to the academic significance of “classic dialogue” researches. The socialist market economy must be based on the prescribed levels of “subjective society” and “objective society”. This is to facilitate the establishment of “critical knowledge theory” for the historical subaltern of “ Capital ”.