期刊文献+

护岸工程基坑边坡稳定性计算传统方法与数值模拟法的对比 被引量:5

Comparison between traditional method and numerical simulation method for calculating slope stability of foundation pit in bank protection engineering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对航道整治工程中护岸结构的基坑边坡易发生的滑坡坍塌问题,以浙江北部某航线的航道整治工程为例,对该工程的边坡稳定性问题采用传统极限平衡理论的条分法和数值模拟的FLAC3D方法进行对比分析。相比条分法,FLAC3D法分析条件更加完善,在理论上更加可靠,也能对边坡详细区域进行分析,以便进行针对性预防。而条分法计算理论理想化,计算结果偏保守。 Aiming at the problem of landslide collapse in the foundation pit slope of the bank protecting structure in the waterway regulation engineering,taking the waterway regulation engineering of a route in northern Zhejiang Province as an example,the stability of the slope of this project is compared and analyzed by using the traditional article points method based on the traditional limit equilibrium theory and the numerical simulation FLAC3D method.The FLAC3D method is more perfect than the article points method in terms of analysis conditions and more reliable in theory.It can also analyze area of the slope in detail for targeted prevention.The calculation theory of article points method is ideal,and the result is conservative.
作者 回恒酉 谭洪平 仲启珂 HUI Heng-you;TAN Hong-ping;ZHONG Qi-ke(SDC Waterway ConstructionCo.,Ltd.,Ningbo 315200,China)
出处 《水运工程》 北大核心 2019年第4期110-114,共5页 Port & Waterway Engineering
关键词 航道整治 边坡 条分法 FLAC3D法 数值模拟 waterway regulation slope article points method FLAC3D method numerical simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1郑颖人,赵尚毅.有限元强度折减法在土坡与岩坡中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(19):3381-3388. 被引量:1033
  • 2郑颖人,赵尚毅.用有限元强度折减法求边(滑)坡支挡结构的内力[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(20):3552-3558. 被引量:124
  • 3黄文熙.挡土墙的土压力研究,水工建设中的结构力学与岩土力学问题[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1995.219-237.
  • 4陈祖煜.边坡稳定分析--极限平衡法的改进和应用[M].北京:清华大学,1991..
  • 5Griffiths D V, Lane P A. Slope stability analysis by finite elements[ J]. Geotechnique, 1999,49(3 ): 387 -403.
  • 6Dawson E M,Roth W H, Drescher A. Slope stability analysis by strength reduction [J]. Geotechnique,1999,49(6) :835 -840.
  • 7Ugai K. A method of calculation of total factor of safety of slopes by elastic - plastic FEM [J]. Soils and Foundations. JGS, 1989, 29 (2):190 - 195.
  • 8Ugai K, Leshchinsky D. Three -dimensional limit equilibrium method and finite element analysis: a comparison of results [ J ]. Soil and Foundation. 1995; 35(4): 1 -7.
  • 9赵尚毅.[D].重庆:后勤工程学院,2004.
  • 10Zhang X. Three- dimensional stability analysis of concave in plan view[ J]. J of Geotech Eng. ,ASCE, 1988,114:658 -671.

共引文献774

同被引文献48

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部