期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人手术系统在子宫内膜癌全面分期手术中的应用价值 被引量:7

The Da Vinci Robotic- Assisted operation in comprehensive staging of endometrial carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨达芬奇机器人手术系统在子宫内膜癌全面分期手术中的应用价值。方法选取2015-01—2018-06间在郑州大学第一附属医院接受全面分期手术的200例子宫内膜癌患者。将行达芬奇机器人手术系统手术的患者作为机器人组,将行腹腔镜手术的患者作为腹腔镜组,各100例。比较2组患者的手术时间及术中出血量、并发症、淋巴结清扫数和术后肛门恢复排气时间及住院时间等指标。结果 2组患者均顺利完成手术,术后肛门恢复排气时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。机器人组的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目及术后住院时间均优于腹腔镜组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组术中发生并发症率及各随访6个月内的并发症发生率和复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论达芬奇机器人手术系统应用于子宫内膜癌全面分期手术,安全可行,是子宫内膜癌全面分期手术的新选择。 Objective To investigate the application of Da Vinci robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery in the comprehensive staging of endometrial carcinoma.Methods A total of 200 patients with endometrial carcinoma were enrolled in the first affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2015-01 to 2018-06. The results were as follows:(1) A total of 200 patients with endometrial carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Patients who underwent the Da Vinci robotic surgery system were treated as robot groups. The patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were treated as laparoscopy group(100 cases each). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, complications, lymph node dissection, anal recovery and exhaust time and average hospital stay were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in anal recovery time between the two groups(P>0.05). The operative time, the amount of bleeding, the number of lymph node dissection and the average hospital stay after operation in the robot group were better than those of the laparoscopic group. There was no significant difference in complication rate and recurrence rate within 6 months of follow-up between the two groups(P>0.05), but there was no significant difference in complication rate and recurrence rate between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Da Vinci robot surgery system is safe and feasible for all-round staging of endometrial carcinoma. It is a new choice for all-round staging of endometrial cancer.
作者 黄路遥 纪妹 赵曌 李悦 许鹏琳 陈淑英 黄晓天 刘亚芬 Huang Luyao;Ji Mei;Zhao Zhao;Li Yue;Xu Penglin;Chen Shuying;Huang Xiaotian;Liu Yafen(Department of gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou,450052,China)
出处 《河南外科学杂志》 2019年第2期19-21,共3页 Henan Journal of Surgery
基金 达芬奇机器人在妇科恶性肿瘤中的临床应用价值(650821)
关键词 子宫内膜癌 达芬奇机器人手术系统 腹腔镜手术 Endometrial carcinoma The Da Vinci Robotic-Assisted system Laparoscopic operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1Childers JM, Brzechffa PR, Hatch KD, et al. Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) of endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1993, 51(1): 53-38.
  • 2Childers JM, Hatch KD, Tran AN, et al. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadeneetomy in gynecologic malignancies[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 82(5): 741-747.
  • 3Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2 [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(32): 5331-5336.
  • 4Mourits MJ, Bijen CB, Arts HJ, et al. Safety of laparoseopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(8): 763-771.
  • 5Palomba S, Falbo A, Russo T, et al. Updating of a recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the safety and the efficacy of the laparoscopic surgery for treating early stage endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2009, 114(1): 135-136.
  • 6Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, et al. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing[J]. Br J Urol, 1996, 77(6):805-812.
  • 7Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function[J]. J Sex Marital Ther, 2000, 26(2): 191-208.
  • 8Meston CM. Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder[J]. J Sex Marital Ther, 2003, 29(1):39-46.
  • 9Palomba S, Ghezzi F, Falbo A, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: a 10-year retrospective muhicenter analysis[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2012, 22(3):425-433.
  • 10Lu Z, Yi X, Feng W, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy for patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: experience from an institute in China[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2012, 38(7): 1011-1017.

共引文献73

同被引文献51

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部