摘要
事实意义上的损害广泛而复杂,在损害赔偿范围确定过程中蕴含着诸多法政策考量因素。归责原则是一个动态、开放的体系,具有明确保护原告或被告的政策导向性。法院在裁判过程中不能局限于形式推理,而应将政策考量贯穿于损害、违法性、因果关系、过错等构成要件之中。为追求社会效果,法院可通过多种渠道实现对原告的救济,也可基于政策考量突破完全赔偿原则。法律解释不能拘泥于规范语言或概念体系等,还须考虑该规范的实践意义、设立目的及其价值取向。
The damage in fact is extensive and complicated,and there are many legal and policy-oriented thinking in the determination of damage compensation scope.The principle of imputation is a dynamic and open system with clear policy orientation to protect the plaintiff or defendant.In the process of adjudication,the court should not be limited to formal reasoning,but should run the policy-oriented thinking through the constitution requisites such as damage,illegality,causality and fault.In order to pursue social effect,the court can use a variety of channels to achieve the relief of the plaintiff,or break through the principle of full compensation based on policy-oriented thinking.Legal interpretation should not be confined to normative language or conceptual system,but should also consider the practical significance,purpose and value orientation of the standard.
作者
王学敏
WANG Xuemin(School of Law,Yantai University,Yantai,Shandong,264005,China)
出处
《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》
2019年第2期79-85,共7页
Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
关键词
损害赔偿
法政策考量
归责原则
构成要件
compensation for damages
legal policy-oriented thinking
the principle of imputation
constitution requisites