摘要
席勒将卢梭作为哀歌诗人的一位代表人物,哀歌诗人在自然与艺术、理想与现实对立的基础上,主要描绘自然和理想。以哀歌诗的角度解读卢梭的《爱弥儿》,有助于揭示其中自然与文明、公众教育与自然教育的对立。卢梭最初试图调和对立的两面,想要爱弥儿既保持自然人的天性,又成为一个公民,但这一设想最终破灭。
Schiller considered Rousseau as a representative poet of lamentation. On the basis of the opposition between nature and art, ideal and reality, poets of lamentation mainly depicts nature and ideal. Interpreting Rousseau’s Emile from the perspective of lamentation poems is conductive to revealing the opposition between nature and civilization, public education and natural education. Rousseau initially tried to reconcile the two opposing sides and expected Emile to keep the nature of human beings and to be a citizen, but his idea was eventually shattered.
出处
《闽南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2019年第1期73-78,共6页
Journal of Minnan Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences