写作自动评价系统在大学英语写作教学中的应用被引量：1

Application of Writing Automatic Evaluation System in Teaching of College English Writing

下载PDF

导出

摘要梳理国内外写作自动评价系统的发展状况及其在写作教学中应用的理论基础,以批改网为例,通过实证研究,探讨该系统在大学英语写作教学中的有效性。研究证明:批改网能够激发学生自主写作的热情,提高学生的写作成绩和水平,是改进大学英语写作教学的有效手段。 By introducing the development of writing automatic evaluation system at home and abroad and the theories applied in the teaching of writing,the paper takes PiGai system as an example and discusses the effectiveness of such system in English teaching.The result indicates that the system can enhance students’writing competence and stimulates their autonomous writing enthusiasm.It is an effective method for improving the existing teaching mode of English writing.

作者赵雪 ZHAO Xue

机构地区大连医科大学中山学院

出处《中国教育技术装备》 2018年第23期35-36,41,共3页 China Educational Technology & Equipment

基金辽宁省教育评价协会项目"‘互联网+教育’背景下民办院校大学英语教学模式实证研究"(项目编号:PJHYYB17250)阶段性成果

关键词写作自动评价系统大学英语写作教学批改网 writing automatic evaluation system college English writing teaching PiGai system

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1梁茂成,文秋芳.国外作文自动评分系统评述及启示[J].外语电化教学,2007(5):18-24. 被引量：185
2丁丽蓉,张广林.现代信息技术在大学英语写作教学中的应用——以写作自动评价系统为例[J].情报科学,2014,32(8):118-121. 被引量：15

二级参考文献40

1陈玫.教学模式与写作水平的相互作用——英语写作“结果法”与“过程法”对比实验研究[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(6):460-464. 被引量：90
2Attali, Y. and Burstein, J. Automated essay scoring with Erater V. 2.0 [ A ]. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA), Philadelphia, June 13 - 18, 2004.
3Bachman, L. F. Fundamental considerations in language testing [ M ]. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
4Blok, H. , and de Glopper, K. 1992. Large scale writing assessment[A]. In L. Verhoeven and J. H. A. L. De Jong (eds.). The construct of language proficiency [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1992 : 101 - 111.
5Burstein, J.C. , Kukich, K. , Wolff, S. , Lu, C. , Chodorow, M., Braden-Harder, L. & Harris, M.D. Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique [ A ]. In The Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Association of Computation[ C], 1998a.
6Burstein, J. C. , Kukieh, K. , Wolff, S. E. , Lu, C. , & Chodorow, M. Enriching automated scoring using discourse marking [ A ]. Paper presented at the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Marking at the annual meeting of the Association, 1998b.
7Burstein, J. , Kukich, K. , Braden-Harder, L. , Chodorow, M. , Hua, S. & Kaplan, B. Computer analysis of essay content for automatic score prediction: A prototype automated scoring system for GMAT analytical writing assessment[ R]. (Research Report RR-98-15). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1998c.
8Burstein, J. C., & Marcu, D. , Andreyev, S, & Chodorow, M. Towards automatic classification of discourse elements in essays [ A ]. In Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [ C ], France, 2001:90 - 92.
9Chung, G. , & O'Neil, H. Jr. Methodological approaches to online scoring of essays [ R] ( Report No. CSE-TR-461 ). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1997.
10Cohen, Y. , Ben-Simon, A. & Hovav, M. The effect of specific language features on the complexity of systems for automated essay scoring [ C ]. Paper presented at the IAEA 29th Annual Conference. Manchester, UK,2003.