期刊文献+

海员主观社会地位的构成因素分析 被引量:1

Analysis on the constitute factors of seafarers' subjective social status
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文中从海员的职业特征出发,采用扎根分析法,探讨当前海员主观社会地位的构成因素和特征,为海员职业幸福感测评系统的建立提供理论基础。 Proceeding from the characteristics of seafarer as a vocation,the paper adopts grounded analytical method and probes into the components and characteristics of the present subjective social statues of seafarers,providing a theoretical basis for the establishment of the evaluation system for the vocational happiness of seafarers.
作者 李婷婷 鲍君忠 LI Ting-ting;BAO Jun-zhong(School of Public Administration and Humanities,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian,Liaoning 116026,China;School of Navigation,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian,Liaoning 116026,China)
出处 《中国海事》 2019年第4期41-43,共3页 China Maritime Safety
基金 2017年度辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L17CSH005)
关键词 主观社会地位 职业幸福感 扎根理论 海员 Subjective social status vocational happiness grounded theory seafarer
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1费小冬.扎根理论研究方法论:要素、研究程序和评判标准[J].公共行政评论,2008,1(3):23-43. 被引量:339
  • 2[美]迈尔斯·休伯曼著,张芬芬译.质性资料的分析:方法与实践[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2008.
  • 3Crotty,M..The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process[M]. London: Sage,1998:4.
  • 4Suddaby, R.. From the editors: what grounded theory is not[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(4):633-642.
  • 5Shah, S.K. and Corley, K.G.. Building better theory by bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2006,43(8):1825-1835.
  • 6Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y.. Handbook of Qualitative Research[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,1994.
  • 7Charmaz, K.. Constructivist and Objectivist Grounded Theory. In N. K. Denzin de Y.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.,)[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000:509-535.
  • 8Charmaz, K.. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis [M]. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publications,2006.
  • 9Glaser, B. & Hohon, J.. The Grounded Theory Seminar Reader[M]. Mill Valley: Sociology Press,2007.
  • 10Charmaz, K.. Grounded theory. In J.A. Smith, R. Harre & L.Van Langenhove (Eds.) Rethinking methods in psychology[M]. London: Sage, 1995:27 -49.

共引文献190

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部