期刊文献+

基于Web of Science的失禁相关性皮炎护理研究文献计量分析 被引量:1

Bibliometric analysis of incontinence-associated dermatitis nursing research based on Web of Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]分析失禁相关性皮炎护理研究的分布情况,为今后研究者选择研究方向提供参考。[方法]在Web of Science中的科学引文索引(SCI-E)、社会科学引文索引(SSCI)2个数据库中,采用文献计量学方法,对全球失禁性皮炎护理研究文献进行统计分析。[结果]2003年—2017年全球21个国家,145个研究机构的245位研究人员共发表了失禁相关性皮炎的护理文献82篇,以非试验性研究居多。美国发文量及科研机构发文量最多,Journal of Wound Ostomy And Continence Nursing是载文量最多的杂志。被引频次最高的是Gray M发表的关于失禁相关性皮炎的共识。[结论]失禁相关性皮炎护理领域正处于发展阶段,预防及干预已是研究的热点问题。护理干预的对照研究及质性研究是今后失禁相关性皮炎护理领域的研究热点。 Objective: To analyze the distribution of incontinence-related dermatitis nursing research,and provide reference for future researchers to choose research directions. Methods: Published articles about incontinence-associated dermatitis nursing were retrieved and analyzed by literature bibliometrics method based on SCI-E and SSCI databases of Web of Science. Results: A total of 82 papers were collected from 245 researchers in 145 research institutions in 21 countries from 2003 to 2017.Most of them were non-experimental studies.The American authors published the most papers,the largest number of papers were published by American research institutes.Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing was the most popular journal.The most popular article was on consensus of incontinence-associated dermatitis which was published by Gray M. Conclusions: The nursing field of incontinence-related dermatitis is in the development stage.Prevention and intervention have become hotspots in research.The control study and qualitative research on nursing intervention are the research hotspots in the nursing field of incontinence-related dermatitis.
作者 周瀚 杨静萍 胡爱玲 张利峰 ZHOU Han;YANG Jingping;HU Ailing;ZHANG Lifeng(Sun Yat-sen University School of Nursing,Guangdong 510080 China)
出处 《全科护理》 2019年第11期1284-1287,共4页 Chinese General Practice Nursing
关键词 失禁相关性皮炎 文献计量学 护理 incontinence-associated dermatitis bibliometrics nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1Jones A W. Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology ioumals: What do the numbers really mean[ J]. Forensic Science [ntemational, 2003, 133 ( 1 - 2) : 1 - 7.
  • 2Oelrich B, Peters R, Jung K. A bibliometric evaluation of publications in urological journals among European Union Countries Between 2000 - 2005 [ J ]. European Urology, 2007, 52 (4) : 1238 - 1248.
  • 3Stringer M J, Sales-Pardo M, Amaral LAN. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information [ J ]. PLoS One, 2008, 3(2) : 1 -7.
  • 4West J D, Bergstrom T C, Bergstrom C T,et al. [ EB/OL]. [ 2012 - 08 - 20 ]. http://www, eigenfactor, org/ about, htm.
  • 5Rizkallah J, Sin D D. Integrative approach to quality assessment of medical journals using impact factor, eigenfactor, and article influence scores[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(4) : e10204.
  • 6Sillet A, Katsahian S, Rang H, et al. The eigenfaetor (TM) score in highly specific medical fields: The dental model[ J ]. Journal of Dental Research, 2012, 91 (4) : 329 -333.
  • 7Davis P M. Eigenfactor:Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008, 59(13) :2186 - 2188.
  • 8Waltman L, Van Eck N J. The relation between eigenfactor, audience factor, and influence weight[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61 ( 7 ) : 1476 - 1486.
  • 9Hung Kuangchen, Lan Shoujen, Liu Jungtung. Global trend in articles related to stereotactic published in science citation index-expanded[J]. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 2012, 26(2) : 258 - 264.
  • 10Estabrooks C A, Winther C, Katz S. A bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing [ J ]. Nursing Research, 2004, 53(5) : 293 -303.

共引文献58

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部