期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转的效果比较

Effect comparison of laparoscopy and open surgery on elderly patients with ovarian tumor pedicle torsion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转的效果。方法:回顾性分析2014年6月至2016年6月的200例老年卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转患者的临床资料,按手术方式不同分成观察组与对照组,100例采用开腹手术为对照组,另100例采用妇科腹腔镜手术为观察组。比较两组手术相关指标及并发症情况。结果:观察组术中失血量、麻醉时间、手术时间、胃肠道恢复时间、住院天数少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组并发症发生率2.00%,低于对照组的11.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗老年卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转的效果优于开腹手术治疗效果。 Objective: To compare effects of laparoscopy and open surgery on elderly patients with ovarian tumor pedicle torsion.Methods: The clinical data of 200 elderly patients with ovarian tumor pedicle torsion treated from June 2014 to June 2016 in Xishui county maternal and child health hospital of Huanggang city were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into observation group(n=100) and control group(n=100) according to the different surgical methods. The control group was treated with the open surgery, while the observation group was treated with the laparoscopy. The surgery-related indicators and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The intraoperative blood loss, anesthesia time, operation time, gastrointestinal recovery time and hospitalization day in the observation group were better than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The complication rate in the observation group was 2.00%, which was lower than that in the control group of 11.00%, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopy in the treatment of the elderly patients with ovarian tumor pedicle torsion is superior to open surgery.
作者 张爱彬 胡丹 ZHANG Aibin;HU Dan(Xishui County Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Huanggang 438200 Hubei, China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2019年第5期16-17,共2页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 腹腔镜手术 开腹手术 老年卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转 Laparoscopy Open surgery Elderly patient with ovarian tumor pedicle torsion Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献97

  • 1赵倩,边爱平.腹腔镜子宫切除术对IL-2、HLA-DR表达的影响[J].医药论坛杂志,2006,27(12):13-15. 被引量:2
  • 2赵映华,李孟达,彭小萍,薛萍萍.具有盆腔淋巴结转移的宫颈癌预后影响因素研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2007,17(5):623-625. 被引量:19
  • 3Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(7):695-700.
  • 4Zullo F, Falbo A, Palomba S. Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(2):94-100.
  • 5Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endornetrial cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, 9:CD006655.
  • 6Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements[J]. B JOG, 2010, 117(6):746-751.
  • 7Arimoto T, Kawana K, Adaehi K, et al. Minimization of curative surgery for treatment of early cervical cancer: a review[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2015, 45(7):611-616.
  • 8Nezhat FR, DeNoble SM, Liu CS, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging and debulking of apparent advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers[J]. JSLS, 2010, 14(2):155-168.
  • 9Kajiyama H, Mizuno M, Shibata K, et al. Recurrence-predicting prognostic factors for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery: a multi-institutional study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 175:97-102.
  • 10Fanning J, Yacoub E, Hojat R. Laparoscopic-assisted cytoreduction for primmT advanced ovarian cancer: success, morbidity and survival[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 123(1): 47-49.

共引文献267

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部