期刊文献+

恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪的客观处罚条件——《刑法》第196条第2款的理解与适用 被引量:23

Objective Conditions for the Punishment of Malicious Overdrawing of Credit Card Fraud : The Understanding and Application of Article 196(2) of the Criminal Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法实践不当扩大恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪的处罚范围的一个重要原因,是没有正确理解《刑法》第196条第2款所规定的"经发卡银行催收后仍不归还"的体系地位;"经发卡银行催收仍不归还"既不是恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪的构成要件要素与责任要素,也不是仅具有语感意义,而是客观处罚条件。恶意透支时具有非法占有目的,但发卡银行催收后予以归还的,虽然成立信用卡诈骗罪,但因为缺乏客观处罚条件,不能给予刑罚处罚;透支后产生不归还的意思因而未归还的,以及透支后由于客观原因不能归还的,原本就不成立信用卡诈骗罪。恶意透支后,在提起公诉前或者一审判决前由持卡人或者保证人全部归还的,应当不起诉或者应当免予刑事处罚;客观处罚条件的法律效果适用于所有的犯罪人,而不应当将"曾因信用卡诈骗受过两次以上处罚的"行为人排除在外。 Judicial practices have unduly expanded the punishment scope of malicious overdrawing of credit card fraud. One main reason for this expansion is the condition of Article 196(2),which stipulates"one refuses to repay the overdrawn amount after the bank claims the collection",has not been understood properly within the system of the Criminal Law. "One refuses to repay the overdrawn amount after the bank claims the collection"neither is one of the constitutional elements of malicious overdrawing of the crime of credit card fraud,nor is here only for linguistic meaning. Instead,it is an objective condition for punishment. If anyone maliciously overdraws with the purpose of illegal possession,but repays the overdrawn amount after the bank claims the collection,even though his act establishes the crime of credit card fraud,he cannot be punished due to the lack of objective condition for punishment. If anyone overdraws without the purpose of illegal possession,that is,he only has malicious intention after he overdraws or he refuses to repay the overdrawn amount due to his objective economic conditions,his act cannot establish the crime of credit card fraud in the first place. If anyone maliciously withdraws with the purpose of illegal possession,but he or his guarantor repays the entire overdrawn amount before he is prosecuted or sentenced for the first trial,he should not be prosecuted or should be exempted from punishment. The legal effect of objective conditions for punishment shall apply to all the criminals who commit this crime. Those have been punished more than twice for the crime of credit card fraud shall not be excluded out of this legal benefit.
作者 张明楷 ZHANG Ming-kai(Tsinghua University School of Law, Beijing 100084, China)
机构地区 清华大学法学院
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期147-163,共17页 Modern Law Science
基金 2016年度国家社会科学基金重大项目"我国刑法修正的理论模型与制度实践研究"(16ZDA060)
关键词 信用卡诈骗罪 恶意透支 客观处罚条件 具体适用 credit card fraud malicious overdrawing objective conditions for punishment specific application
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1夏朝晖.试论合同诈骗罪[J].法商研究,1997,15(4):78-83. 被引量:49
  • 2高湘泽.道德责任的负责和免责条件——评当代西方两种道德责任归因理论[J].中国人民大学学报,2005,19(4):47-53. 被引量:2
  • 3陈兴良.期待可能性问题研究[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2006,24(3):72-81. 被引量:86
  • 4柯葛壮.论信用卡恶意透支犯罪[A]..刑法问题与争鸣(第4辑)[C].北京:中国方正出版社,1998..
  • 5于英君.银行信用卡犯罪的类型及定性研究[A]..刑法问题与争鸣(第4辑)[C].北京:中国方正出版社,1998..
  • 6[日]木村龟二.刑法学词典[Z].上海:上海翻译出版公司,1991..
  • 7董浩琼.拾得他人遗忘在自动柜员机上的信用卡并修改密码取得钱款的行为应以侵占罪认定[J].厦门检察,2000,(6).
  • 8赵柯山.协议透支信用卡应如何处理[N].法制日报,2001—04—28(7).
  • 9黄祥青 陈兴良 主编.信用卡诈骗罪司法适用中的四个问题[A].陈兴良,主编.刑事法判解(第2卷)[C].北京:法律出版社,2000..
  • 10周仰虎 于英君.论信用卡犯罪的立法完善[A]..刑法问题与争鸣(第4辑)[C].北京:中国方正出版社,1998..

共引文献133

同被引文献229

引证文献23

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部