期刊文献+

270例羊膜腔穿刺术产前诊断指征及结果分析 被引量:10

Analysis on the Indications and results of amniocentesis in 270 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析羊膜腔穿刺术产前诊断指征及检出率,探讨提高产前筛查和产前诊断准确率的路径。方法收集本院产前诊断中心近三年筛查咨询后270例行羊膜腔穿刺术胎儿染色体核型分析病例,对其产前诊断指征及检出率进行分析。结果 270例羊膜腔穿刺术中,最常见的三大指征为血清学三联筛查高风险(36.3%)、无创产前检测高风险(28.2%)及超声检查异常(18.5%)。其阳性检出率由高至低依次为:无创产前检测高风险(61.8%)、夫妻一方患病或染色体异常(33.3%)、超声检查异常(22.0%)、不良孕产史(5.6%)及血清学三联筛查高风险(5.1%)。结论无创产前检测是筛查胎儿染色体异常最有效的路径,高风险孕妇必须行侵入性产前诊断以确诊;血清学三联筛查和超声检查是最常用的筛查路径,联合筛查可有效提高胎儿染色体异常检出率,高风险者充分咨询后建议行侵入性产前诊断。单纯高龄不作为产前诊断独立指征,若合并血清学筛查高风险或超声异常建议行侵入性产前诊断。 Objective The indication and positive rate of karyotype of amniocentesis in our hospital were analyzed, and how to improve the accuracy rate of prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis was discussed. Methods Analysis of prenatal diagnosis and detection rate of fetal chromosome karyotype analysis in 270 cases of amniocentesis in our hospital. Results In the 270 cases of amniocentesis, the most common three puncture indications were serological triple screening(36.3%), high risk of NIPT(28.2%) and pathological ultrasonography findings(18.5%). The positive detection rate from high to low is:high risk of NIPT(61.8%), parental translocation or marker chromosome carriage(33.3%), pathological ultrasonography findings(22.0%), adverse pregnancy history(5.6%) and serological screening(5.1%). Conclusion NIPT is the most effective path screening for fetal chromosomal disease, high risk pregnant women must be diagnosed with invasive prenatal diagnosis. Serological triple screening and ultrasound examination are the most commonly used screening paths. Combined screening can effectively improve the detection rate of fetal chromosomal diseases, high risk full consultation after suggestions for invasive prenatal diagnosis. An independent indication of prenatal diagnosis is not an advanced age pregnant women, and invasive prenatal diagnosis is suggested if the high risk of serological screening or abnormal ultrasound is recommended.
作者 黄林杰 杨俐 彭建红 冯春 徐丹 刘娟 张元珍 马建鸿 HUANG Linjie;YANG li;PENG Jianhong;FENG chun;XU dan;LIU juan;ZHANG yuanzhen;MA Jianhong(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, China)
出处 《中国生育健康杂志》 2019年第3期226-231,共6页 Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health
基金 湖北省科技支撑计划项目(2015BCA310)
关键词 羊膜腔穿刺术 产前诊断 染色体核型分析 Amniocentesis Prenatal diagnosis Chromosome karyotype analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1张月萍,徐建忠,殷民,陈美芳,任德麟.染色体平衡易位携带者妊娠风险及妊娠结局的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(9):592-596. 被引量:36
  • 2Morel F,Douet-Guilbert N,Roux C, et al. Meiotic segregation of a t(7; 8) (q11. 21; cen) translocation in two carrier brothers. Fertil Steril, 2004,81 : 682-685.
  • 3Perrin A, Morel F, Douet-Guilbert N, et al, A study of meiotic segregation of chromosomes in spermatozoa of translocation carriers using fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Andrologia, 2010,42 : 27-34.
  • 4Miller OJ, Therman E. Human chromosomes. 4th ed. New York: Springer, 2000,239-249.
  • 5Wyss D, DeLozier CD, Daniell J, et al. Structural anomalies of the X chromosome: personal observation and review of non- mosaic cases. Clin Genet. 1982,21:145-159.
  • 6American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOGPractice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenataltesting for aneuploidy [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007,110(6):1459-1467.
  • 7Deborah A, Driscoll, Susan Gross, Prenatal screening foraneuploidy [J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(24) :2556-2562.
  • 8Chiu RW,Chan KC,Gao Y,et al,Noninvasive prenatal diagnosisof fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomicsequencing of DNA in maternal plasma [ J]. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA, 2008,I05;20458-20463.
  • 9中华人民共和国卫生部.WS322. 2—2010胎儿常见染色体异常与开放性神经管缺陷的产前筛查诊断技术标准[DB/OL].http://www. moh. gov. cn/fzs/s7852d/201006/3ee55f6ae8c64663a66bb60037793859. shtml.
  • 10Agarwal A, Sayres LC, Cho MK,et al. Commercial landscape ofnoninvasive prenatal testing in the United States [ J ]. PrenatDiagn, 2013,33(6):521-531.

共引文献105

同被引文献92

引证文献10

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部