期刊文献+

基于视频吸引力分析的 MOOC课程视频质量评价研究 被引量:6

Video Quality Evaluation of MOOC Course Based on Video Attractiveness Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着MOOC的发展,在线课程视频质量评价逐渐成为教学研究热点。评价课程视频质量,对于提升视频制作技巧和吸引力、提高在线授课质量、改进教学方法等具有重要意义。文章通过对学习者群体观看行为的视频吸引力模型构建,提出将视频吸引力的评估指数作为课程质量的评估参考依据,用于评价不同课程视频质量的差异,从而为优化课程建设提供借鉴参考。 With the development of MOOC, the evaluation of online course video quality has gradually become the most written topics of teaching research. It is of great significance to evaluate the video quality of the course for improvement of video making skills and attraction of video production, the quality of online teaching and teaching methods. This paper constructs the video appeal model of the learner group's viewing behaviors, and proposes that the evaluation index of video appeal should be taken as the reference basis for evaluating the quality of the course. It is used to evaluate the difference of video quality of different courses so as to provide reference for optimizing curriculum construction.
作者 云虹 王思懿 YUN Hong;WANG Si-yi(Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061 , China)
机构地区 长安大学
出处 《黑龙江高教研究》 北大核心 2019年第4期152-155,共4页 Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
关键词 MOOC 视频观看行为规律 视频吸引力 视频质量 H指数 信息熵 MOOC video watching behavior rules video attractiveness video quality H - index information entropy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1魏志慧,陈丽,希建华.网络课程教学交互质量评价指标体系的研究[J].开放教育研究,2004,10(6):34-39. 被引量:51
  • 2冯秀琪,赵可云.梅瑞尔首要教学原理及网络课程的评价[J].开放教育研究,2005,11(5):67-71. 被引量:14
  • 3武法提.论网络课程及其开发[J].开放教育研究,2006,12(1):68-73. 被引量:69
  • 4Chao,T. , Saj,T. , & Tessier,F. (2009). Establishing a quality review for online courses [ EB/OL]. http://www. educause. edu/EDU- CAUSE + Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/EstablishingaQual- ityReviewforO/157414. 2009/9.
  • 5陈姿伶(2009).数位教材品质认证指标制定与厂商执行绩效[R].海峡两岸e-learning质量管控交流研讨会.
  • 6段崇江,张建伟,王学优,滕霞(2002).网络课程评价标准研究述评[c].昆明:中国教育技术协会.
  • 7贺嘉生(2009).数位学习品质认证--学习服务认证指标制定与厂商执行绩效[R].海峡两岸e-learning质量管控交流研讨会.
  • 8Rhode, J. F. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced on-line learning environments : An exploration of learner preferences[ J]. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 10, No 1,ISSN: 1492-3831,.
  • 9Roblyer, M. D. , & Ekhaml, L. (2000). How interactive are your distance courses? A rubric for assessing interaction in distance learn- ing[ J ]. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3 (2).
  • 10Schlegel, B. J. ( 2003 ). The relationship between interactivity in online distance education courses and course quality as measured by student satisfaction[ D]. The State University of New Jersey: (10).

共引文献363

同被引文献72

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部