摘要
目的研究腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除与传统经腹子宫肌瘤剔除的效果比较。方法选取本院2015年06月~2017年12月间收治50例子宫肌瘤患者进行实验研究,采用随机数字法将患者分为实验组和对照组,每组25例,实验组采用腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除进行治疗,对照组采用传统经腹子宫肌瘤剔除进行治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果实验组手术时间、失血量较对照组稍有优势,首次排气时间、体温恢复正常时间明显优于对照组,术后对照组的并发症明显高于实验组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除治疗子宫肌瘤,临床效果良好,值得推广应用。
Objective To study the effect of laparoscopic m yom ectom y and traditional abdom inal myomectomy. Methods From June 2015 to December 2017, 50 patients with uterine leiomyoma were selected and divided into experimental group and control group with 25 cases in each group. The experimental group was treated by laparoscopic myomectomy. The control group was treated by traditional abdominal hysteromyoma culling, and the two groups were compared. Results The operation time and blood loss in the experimental group were slightly superior to those in the control group. The time of the first exhaust and the recovery o f body temperature in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group. The complications in the latter control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of laparoscopic myomectomy for uterine leiomyoma is good and worth popularizing.
出处
《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》
2018年第35期7-8,共2页
Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology