循证干预模式在缺血性脑卒中护理中的应用价值

Application value of evidence-based intervention model in ischemic stroke nursing

目的研究循证干预模式在缺血性脑卒中护理中的应用价值。方法选取本院2016年1月至2018年6月收治的74例缺血性脑卒中患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将患者分为研究组(37例)和对照组(37例)。对照组选用常规护理模式,研究组选用循证干预模式。比较两组护理前、后神经功能缺损程度、住院时间及护理满意度。结果护理前,两组患者美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,两组患者的NIHSS评分均降低,且研究组低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的住院时间短于对照组,护理满意度高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在缺血性脑卒中护理中,循证干预模式的应用效果明显优于常规护理模式,其可进一步改善患者的神经功能缺损状况,缩短住院时间,提升护理满意度,值得推广应用。

Objective To study the application value of evidence-based intervention model in ischemic stroke nursing.Methods Seventy-four patients with ischemic stroke admitted in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2018 were enrolled as the study objects and divided into study group(37 cases) and control group(37 cases) according to the random number table method. The control group was given routine nursing mode, and the study group was given evidence-based intervention mode. The neurological deficits before and after nursing, hospitalization time and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results Before nursing, there was no significant difference in national institute of health stroke scale(NIHSS) score between the two groups(P>0.05);after nursing, the NIHSS scores of both groups decreased, and that of the study group was lower than the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P <0.05). The hospitalization time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group, and the nursing satisfaction was higher than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In the nursing of ischemic stroke, the evidence-based intervention mode has obviously better effect compared with routine nursing mode, which can further improve the neurological deficits of patients, shorten hospitalization time,improve nursing satisfaction, and is worthy of promotion and application.