期刊文献+

磁共振增强图像三维纹理分析对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值 被引量:12

Three-dimensional texture analysis of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨基于磁共振增强图像的三维纹理分析方法对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析经手术病理证实的16例乳腺癌和18例乳腺良性病变患者的临床和MRI资料。磁共振检查在术前1周内完成。采用MaZda软件对早期动态增强图像进行三维纹理分析,提取整个病变的纹理参数,使用Fisher系数、交互信息(MI)、分类错误概率联合平均相关系数(POE+ACC)三种方法获得30个最优纹理参数,进一步对这些纹理参数进行分类分析,方法包括原始数据分析(RDA)、主成分分析(PCA)、线性分类分析(LDA)和非线性分类分析(NDA)。采用SPSS 16.0统计软件比较乳腺良恶性病变的30个纹理参数有间的差异,采用MedCalc 15.8统计软件,对具有统计学意义的纹理参数进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。结果:基于早期动态增强图像的三维纹理特征,采用非线性分类分析(NDA)的误判率最低,其中POE+ACC联合非线性分类分析(NDA)的误判率最低,误判率为5.88%。在乳腺病变的30个最优纹理参数中,有10个纹理参数在良恶性组间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),相应的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.717~0.755。结论:磁共振增强图像三维纹理分析方法对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断具有良好的临床应用价值。 Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the value of 3D texture analysis of enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods: The clinical and MRI data of 16 cases of breast cancer and 18 cases of benign breast lesions were retrospectively analyzed.All cases were confirmed by surgical pathology and magnetic resonance imaging was completed within one week before surgery.MaZda software was used to analyze the texture of early dynamic enhanced 3d images and extract the texture parameters of the entire lesion.30 optimal texture parameters were obtained by use of the methods of Fisher coefficient,mutual information (MI),classification error probability and average correlation coefficient (POE+ACC).Classification analysis was further performed by use of methods including raw data analysis (RDA),principal component analysis (PCA),linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and nonlinear discriminant analysis (NDA).SPSS 16.0 software was used to compare the texture features of benign and malignant breast lesions.MedCalc 15.8 statistical software was used to analyze the receiver operator characteristic curve of texture parameters which were statistically significant. Results: The nonlinear discriminant analysis (NDA) had the lowest misclassification rate,of which POE+ACC combined with non-linear classification analysis (NDA) had the lowest misclassification rate and misclassification rate was 5.88%.Among the 30 optimal texture parameters for benign and malignant breast lesions,10 were found with statistically significant difference ( P <0.05),and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.717~0.755,respectively. Conclusion: Texture analysis of three-dimensional image of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance has good clinical value in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
作者 邓义 杨壁然 刘志强 鲍军芳 唐亚霞 DENG Yi;YANG Bi-ran;LIU Zhi-qiang(Medical Imaging Department,the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510700,China)
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2019年第4期436-439,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 磁共振成像 动态增强扫描 纹理分析 Breast neoplasms Dynamic contrast enhanced scanning Magnetic resonance imaging Texture analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1蔡世峰,赵斌,王光彬,于台飞.不同类型正常乳腺表观扩散系数值差异的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(2):176-179. 被引量:12
  • 2Rebecca S, Elizabeth W, Otis B, et al. The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths [J]. CA cancer J Clin,2011,61(4) :212-236.
  • 3Raipaul Attariwala,Wayne Picker. Whole body MRIimproved le- sion diction and characterization with diffusion weighted tech- niques[J]. J Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2013,38(2):253 268.
  • 4Kul S,Cansu A,Alhan E,DInc H,et al. Contribution of diffusion- weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the char- acterization of breast tumors[J]. AJR,2011,196(1): 210-217.
  • 5Raipaul Attariwala,Wayne Picker. Whole body MRIimproved le sion diction and characterization with diffusion weighted tech- niques[J]. J Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2013,38(2):253-268.
  • 6Thomassin-Naggara I, De Bazelaire C, Chopier J, et al. Diffusion- weighted MR imaging of the breast: advantages and pitfalls[J]. Eur J Radiology,2013,82(3) :435-443.
  • 7Ei Khouli RH,Jaeobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3. 0T breast MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2010,256 (1) : 64 73.
  • 8Sonmez G, Cute F, Mutlu H, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of benign and malign breast lesionsFJ. Wien Kiln Wochenschr,2011,123(21-22) :655-601.
  • 9Line B. Nilsen, Anne Fangberget, ()liver Geier. Quantitative anal- ysis of diffusion-weightedmagnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b value combinations[J]. Eur J Radi- ology,2013,23(4) : 1027-1033.
  • 10Xin Chen, Wen-ling Li, You-min Guo, et al. Meta analysis of quan- titative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagno sis of breast lesions[J]. BMC Cancer,2010,29(10) :693.

共引文献156

同被引文献57

引证文献12

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部