期刊文献+

AHP-TOPSIS模型的物业管理评标优选法 被引量:1

Property management evaluation preferred method on AHP-TOPSIS model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决物业管理评标优选问题,在结合层次分析法和接近理想解的偏好排序法理论,建立AHP-TOPSIS模型,对4家投标物业管理企业进行综合评价优选.从知名度、标书、现场答辩等方面综合分析评标过程的指标,运用层次分析法确定各个指标的权重,结合接近理想解的偏好排序法建立AHP-TOPSIS优选模型,得到4家投标企业基于评价标准的综合接近度.该结果更优于层次分析法,用AHP-TOPSIS模型解决物业管理评标优选更具有效性和可行性. With analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution,AHP-TOPSIS model is established to solve the preferred property management. Four bidding property management businesses were involved in the comprehensive evaluation. It analyzed the bid evaluation norms from reputation,tender document and live defense,etc. and defined the norm weight with analytic hierarchy process. Then,it established the AHP-TOPSIS model with technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution and acquired the comprehensive proximity based on the four businesses evaluation standard. The result is better than that of the analytic hierarchy process. The AHP-TOPSIS model is more effective and feasible.
作者 张华 陈肖宇 ZHANG Hua;CHEN Xiaoyu(Basic Teaching Department,Shanxi Architecture Vocational and Technical College,Taiyuan 030619,China;College of Civil and Architectural Engineering,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063210,China)
出处 《湖北大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2019年第3期264-269,共6页 Journal of Hubei University:Natural Science
关键词 物业管理 层次分析法 偏好排序法 综合评价模型 评标 property management analytic hierarchy process technique for order preference comprehensive evaluation model bid evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1毛泽华.层次模糊决策法在工程施工招标评标中的应用[J].佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版),2004,22(3):437-441. 被引量:4
  • 2邱广振,王本深.应用层次分析法评标定标[J].沈阳建筑工程学院学报,1996,12(3):291-296. 被引量:5
  • 3黄安永.物业管理(第二版)[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1996,12..
  • 4Saaty T L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].McGraw-Hill Company,1980.
  • 5Saaty T L,Vargas L G,Models,Methods,Concepts & Applications of the Analytic HierarchyProcess(Second Edition)[M].Springer Science+Business Media New York,2012.
  • 6姜启源,谢金星,叶俊.数学模型(第四版)[M].北京高等教育出版社,2011.
  • 7Saaty T L,Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes,[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006(168):557-570.
  • 8Millet I,Saaty T L.On the relativity of relative measures-accommodating both rank preservationand rank reversal in the AHP[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2000(121):205-212.
  • 9Forman E H,Gass S I.The analytic hierarchy process:An exposition[J].Operations Research,2001,49(4):469-486.
  • 10Saaty T L.Rank generation,preservation,and reversal in the analytic hierarchy decision process[J].Journal of the Decision Sciences Institute,1987.18(2).

共引文献43

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部