网络虚拟财产权保护中的请求权配置

Claims in the Protection of Network Virtual Property Right

无救济则无权利,网络虚拟财产法律保护的前提是请求权的配置。然而,"物权说"与"合同说"的界定均不能为网络虚拟财产的保护有效配置请求权。抛开既有学说的纷争直面问题本身后不难发现,网络虚拟财产法律保护中存在两种法律关系,分别要求不同的请求权作为救济的基础:网络用户与侵权人之间的关系需要停止侵害、排除妨碍和损害赔偿请求权作为救济的基础,网络用户与网络平台运营商之间的关系需要合同履行、返还财产和损害赔偿请求权作为救济的基础。因此,从请求权的配置来看,网络用户针对网络虚拟财产所享有的权利,是一种不同于物权的新型支配性财产权,应当获得独立的保护。

The reason why the theory of real right and the theory of creditor’s rights cannot serve as the theoretical basis for the construction of the network virtual property law is that both theories can only be used to establish the legal relationship between two subjects.We should take tripartite legal relations into consideration in the disposition of claims.We could get the conclusion that the network virtual property is an independent property unlike real property from the perspective of disposition of claims.