期刊文献+

索姆斯问题及其解决

Soames' Problem and its Solution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自然语言的意义是当代哲学、逻辑学、语言学、认知科学和人工智能所关心的重要问题之一。迄今为止,人们发展了多种意义理论和学说,其中形式语义学试图用逻辑方法和逻辑模型形式化地定义自然语言的意义。形式语义学内部也有多种不同理论,但蒙塔古等学者所引入的内涵依然是目前关于意义的标准定义。然而,内涵作为自然语言的意义是不充分的,有不少问题无法解决,其中包括哲学家索姆斯提出的一个问题(简称为索姆斯问题)。本文首先介绍内涵概念的形成及索姆斯问题的产生,然后基于结构化命题方法定义两种更为充分的意义——解释义和结构义,从而一般地解决与命题态度相关的许多问题,包括索姆斯问题。 The meaning of natural language is a major problem concerned by contemporary philosophy, logic, linguistics, cognitive science and artificial intelligence. People have developed various kinds of theories or doctrines about meaning, and Formal Semantics attempts to define meaning using logical methods and models. Although there are different theories in Formal Semantics, the mainstream definition of meaning is still intension,which was introduced by Richard Montague and others. Nonetheless, researchers have shown that intension could cause many problems, one of which was introduced by Scott Soames and still lacks a good solution. This article first introduces the concept of intension and the Soames’ problem. Then, based on the method of structured propositions,two kinds of meaning-structured-meaning and explaining-meaning are defined to solve problems related to propositional attitudes reports, including the Soames’ problem.
作者 邢锟 Kun Xing(Department of Philosophy, School of Humanities, Tsinghua University)
出处 《逻辑学研究》 CSSCI 2019年第2期98-110,共13页 Studies in Logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献12

  • 1邹崇理.从逻辑到语言——Barbara H.Partee访谈录[J].当代语言学,2007,9(2):151-165. 被引量:12
  • 2Jeroen Groenendijk,Martin Stokhof. Dynamic predicate logic[J] 1991,Linguistics and Philosophy(1):39~100
  • 3Jon Barwise,Robin Cooper. Generalized quantifiers and natural language[J] 1981,Linguistics and Philosophy(2):159~219
  • 4Xuefeng Wen. A Propositional Logic with Relative Identity Connective and a Partial Solution to the Paradox of Analysis[J] 2007,Studia Logica(2):251~260
  • 5Barbara H. Partee. Comments on Jason Stanley’s “On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism”[J] 2004,Philosophical Studies(1-2):147~159
  • 6David J. Chalmers. Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics[J] 2004,Philosophical Studies(1-2):153~226
  • 7Ryszard Wójcicki. R. Suszko’s situational semantics[J] 1984,Studia Logica(4):323~340
  • 8Richmond H. Thomason. A model theory for propositional attitudes[J] 1980,Linguistics and Philosophy(1):47~70
  • 9M. J. Cresswell. Hyperintensional logic[J] 1975,Studia Logica(1):25~38
  • 10Roman Suszko. Identity connective and modality[J] 1971,Studia Logica(1):7~39

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部