期刊文献+

罗哌卡因复合小剂量舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉用于剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠患者剖宫产术的效果观察 被引量:30

Observation on Efficacy of Ropivacaine Combined with Low Dose of Sufentanil for Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨罗哌卡因复合小剂量舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉用于剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠患者剖宫产术的效果。方法:选取2016年4月至2018年7月黄冈市中心医院收治的剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠拟行剖宫产术患者94例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组47例。对照组患者给予罗哌卡因,观察组患者给予罗哌卡因复合小剂量舒芬太尼。对比两组患者的阻滞效果及产后不良反应发生情况的差异。结果:观察组患者的感觉、运动阻滞起效时间和运动阻滞维持时间明显短于对照组,感觉阻滞维持时间明显长于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者产后不良反应发生率为10.6%(5/47),明显低于对照组的38.3%(18/47),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:罗哌卡因复合小剂量舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉可显著加快剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠患者行剖宫产术时的麻醉速度,延长感觉阻滞的维持时间,提高手术镇痛效果,并减少产后不良反应。 OBJECTIVE:To probe into the effects of ropivacaine combined with low dose of sufentanil for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in cesarean scar pregnancy. METHODS:94 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy admitted into Huanggang Central Hospital from Apr. 2016 to Jul. 2018 were selected and divided into control group and observation group via random number table, with 47 cases in each group. The control group was given ropivacaine, while the observation group was given ropivacaine combined with low dose of sufentanil. Comparison of blocking effects and incidences of postpartum adverse drug reactions between two groups were compared. RESULTS:The onset time of sensory and motor blocking and the maintenance time of motor blocking of observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, the maintenance time of sensory blocking of observation group was significantly longer than that of the control group, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05);the incidence of postpartum adverse drug reactions of observation group was 10.6%(5/47), which was significantly lower than that of the control group(38.3%, 18/47), with statistically significant difference(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The combination of ropivacaine and low dose of sufentanil for combined spinal anesthesia can significantly accelerate the anesthesia speed in operation of cesarean scar pregnancy, prolong the maintenance time of sensory blocking, improve analgesic effect and reduce postpartum adverse drug reactions.
作者 夏劲 陈颖 吴耀华 张慧 XIA Jin;CHEN Ying;WU Yaohua;ZHANG Hui(Dept.of Anesthesiology,Huanggang Central Hospital,Hubei Huanggang 438000,China;Dept.of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,Huanggang Central Hospital,Hubei Huanggang 438000,China;Dept.of Science and Education,Huanggang Central Hospital,Hubei Huanggang 438000,China)
出处 《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2019年第3期315-316,319,共3页 Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
关键词 罗哌卡因 舒芬太尼 剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠 剖宫产 腰硬联合麻醉 Ropivacaine Sufentanil Cesarean scar pregnancy Cesarean section Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献104

  • 1钟锦秀,程俭.小剂量舒芬太尼在剖宫产术麻醉中的应用[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2014,52(S02):119-120. 被引量:9
  • 2陈祥东.子宫动脉栓塞术后硬膜外腔镇痛与静脉全身镇痛的比较[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(4):235-235. 被引量:2
  • 3Liu YJ, Li GH, Chen Y, et al. A descriptive analysis of the indications for aesarean section in China's Mainland. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014, 14:410-418.
  • 4Gupta A, Aneja A, Bahl N, et al. Save the uterus. J Fetal Med, 2014, 4(1) :181-185.
  • 5Aggarwal R, Suneja A, Vaid NB, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: a critical review. J Obstet Gynecol India, 2012, 62 (1) : 57-61.
  • 6Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gyneeol, 2006,107 (6) : 1226-1232.
  • 7Claeys J, Hellendoorn I, Hamerlynck T, et al. The risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy, a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Gynecol Surg, 2014, 11: 197-206.
  • 8Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Risk of pla- centa previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a populationbased study and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2011, 11 (1) :95.
  • 9Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol, 2002,99 (6) : 976-980.
  • 10Gayat E, Resche-Rigon M, Morel O, et al. Predictive factors of advanced interventional procedures in a multicentre severe postpartum haemorrhage study. Intensive Care Med, 2011, 37(11) : 1816-1825.

共引文献41

同被引文献245

引证文献30

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部