期刊文献+

人工椎间盘矢状面覆盖比对颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后椎旁骨化的影响 被引量:11

Influence of artificial disc sagittal coverage ratio on paravertebral ossification after cervical artificial disc arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Bryan人工椎间盘矢状面覆盖比(SCR)与颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后椎旁骨化(PO)形成的关系。方法回顾性分析2003年12月—2007年12月因颈椎退行性疾病行单节段Bryan人工椎间盘置换术患者临床资料,共71例,所有患者均随访>10年,在术后即刻侧位X线片上测量人工椎间盘SCR。末次随访时,通过CT与X线片结合评估置换节段PO分级。使用多因素logistic回归法分析人工椎间盘SCR、年龄等因素对高等级PO形成的影响。对多因素logistic回归分析的阳性结果采用受试者工作特征曲线及曲线下面积进行检验与量化。结果末次随访时,71例患者中66例出现PO,其中0级5例,1级16例,2级25例,3级7例,4级18例。高等级(34级)PO患者人工椎间盘SCR小于低等级PO(02级)患者,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。所有研究的相关因素中,仅人工椎间盘SCR是PO形成的影响因素(比值比0.659,P <0.05)。人工椎间盘SCR预测PO形成的工作特征曲线下面积为0.878(95%置信区间0.7760.981),且计算得出人工椎间盘SCR的最佳判断阈值为95%。结论人工椎间盘SCR是颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后PO形成的影响因素,人工椎间盘过小会造成术后远期高等级PO形成的概率增大,置入的人工椎间盘SCR应尽量> 95%。 Objective To evaluate the correlation between artificial disc sagittal coverage ratio(SCR) and paravertebral ossification(PO) after cervical artificial disc arthroplasty. Methods Clinical data of 71 patients underwent single segmental Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty from December 2003 to December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were followed for >10 years. The SCR was measured at lateral roentgenograph immediately after operation. The grades of PO were evaluated by CT and roentgenograph at the final follow-up. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of the artificial disc SCR,age and other factors on the occurrence of high grade PO. The receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve was used to evaluate the significant results of logistic regression and calculate the optimal diagnostic value. Results At the final follow-up,PO was detected in 66 patients. Grade 0,1,2,3,and 4 PO occurred in 5,16,25,7,and 18 patients respectively. Compared with patients with low grade(0 - 2) PO,the artificial disc SCR was smaller in patients with high grade(3 - 4) PO,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). In all relative factors studied,only the artificial disc SCR was an influential factor of the PO formation(odds ratio 0.659,P < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of artificial disc SCR to predict PO formation was 0.878(95% confidence interval 0.776 - 0.981),and the optimal diagnostic threshold was 95%. Conclusion The artificial disc SCR is an influencing factor for the formation of PO after cervical artificial disc arthroplasty. The smaller artificial disc SCR will cause the higher grade of PO in the long-term follow-up, and especially the artificial disc SCR should be as high as 95%.
作者 韩骁 田伟 何达 宋卿鹏 张宁 李祖昌 王晋超 HAN Xiao;TIAN Wei;HE Da;SONG Qing-peng;ZHANG Ning;LI Zu-chang;WANG Jin-chao(Department of Spinal Surgery,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Fourth Clinical Medical College of Peking University,Beijing 100035,China)
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2019年第2期79-83,共5页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
基金 北京市医院管理局"使命"人才计划(SML20150401) 北京市科学技术委员会科技计划项目(Z161100000516134)
关键词 颈椎 椎间盘退行性变 假体和植入物 手术后并发症 Cervical vertebrae Intervertebral disc degeneration Prostheses and implants Postoperative complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献56

  • 1孙宇,潘胜发,张凤山,张立.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾患的早期临床观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(2):85-89. 被引量:44
  • 2Lee JH, Jung TG, Kim HS, et al. Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement[J]. Spine J, 2010, 10(8) :676-682.
  • 3McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16(4) :384-389.
  • 4White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM. The basic kinematics of the human spine. A review of past and current knowledge[ J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 1978, 3(1) :12-20.
  • 5Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker R J, et al. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(26):2933-2940.
  • 6Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, et al. Clinical and radi- ographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial[ J ]. J Neu- rosurg Spine, 2007, 6 ( 3 ) : 198-209.
  • 7Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty : an in vitro human cadaveric model [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2005, 30 ( 10 ) : 1165-1172.
  • 8Rousseau MA, Cottin P, Levante S, et al. In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-and-socket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane: cranial versus caudal geometric center[ J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2008, 33(1):E6-9.
  • 9Kim SW, Paik SH, Castro PA, et al. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty [ J ]. Spine J, 2010, 10(8) :683-688.
  • 10Kang KC, Lee CS, Han JH, et al. The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement [ J ]. Spine J, 2010, 10 ( 8 ) :689-696.

共引文献70

同被引文献61

引证文献11

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部