期刊文献+

如何让道歉成为危机处理的利器——基于克利费尔道歉4R模式的分析 被引量:1

How to Make Apology a Useful Tool in Crisis Management:Analysis Based on Kleefeld's Apology 4R Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 被冒犯、被伤害形成的怨恨、矛盾与冲突是导致危机的重要因素,消除这些因素的重要途径是道歉,以满足双方尤其是被冒犯方受损的情感需求,修复被破坏的关系而化解危机。但道歉也是一柄双刃剑,只有好的道歉才可能成为危机处理的利器。为什么道歉能化解危机?如何道歉才能有效化解危机?危机管理视野下对道歉概念、动机与作用机理进行分析,运用克利费尔提出的4R模式对两个危机案例中道歉进行比较研究,从示悔意、担责任、表决心与做补救四步骤中为危机情境中的道歉提供一个可操作的框架。 Resentment,contradiction and conflict caused by being offended and injured are important factors leading to crisis,and the important way to eliminate these factors is to apologize in order to meet the damaged emotional needs of both sides,especially the offended party.However,apology is also a double-edged sword,and only a good apology can become a useful tool in crisis management.Why does an apology defuse a crisis? And how can apologies be effective in resolving the crisis? This paper analyzes the concept,motivation and mechanism of apology from the perspective of crisis management,and makes a comparative study of apology in two crisis cases by using the 4R model proposed by Kleefeld.An operational framework is provided,which includes four steps:repentance,responsibility,determination and remediation.
作者 杨安华 YANG Anhua(College of Public Administration,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,Hunan China)
出处 《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期143-153,共11页 Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(18BZZ060)
关键词 危机 危机处理 道歉 道歉4R模式 crisis crisis management apology Kleefeld's apology 4R model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献105

  • 1罗春明,黄希庭.宽恕的心理学研究[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):908-915. 被引量:68
  • 2蒋景阳,胡蓉.“道歉”的语用研究及对Meier“修复工作”的完善[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,35(6):170-176. 被引量:11
  • 3李军.道歉行为的话语模式与语用特点分析[J].语言教学与研究,2007(1):11-19. 被引量:42
  • 4韦庆旺,郑全全.意图、名声及申述方式对冒犯者所受责备的影响[J].应用心理学,2006,12(4):368-373. 被引量:2
  • 5Andiappan,M,Trevio,L.K. Beyond righting the wrong:Supervisor-subordinate reconciliation after an injustice[J].Human Relations,2011,(03):359-386.
  • 6Blader,S.L,Tyler,T.R. Testing and extending the group engagement model:Linkages between social identity,procedural justice,economic outcomes,and extra-role behavior[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,(02):445-464.
  • 7Bolton,L,Keh,H.T,Alba,J.W. How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2010,(03):564-576.
  • 8Bottom,W.P,Gibson,K,Daniels,S.E,Murnighan,J.K. When talk is not cheap:Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation[J].Organization Science,2002,(05):497-513.
  • 9Chiaburu,D.S,Marinova,S.V. What determines employees' role perceptions? An instrumentality-based explanation[J].Public Personnel Management,2012,(01):45-46.
  • 10De Cremer,D,Schouten,B.C. When apologies for injustice matter:The role of respect[J].European Psychologist,2008,(04):239-247.

共引文献31

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部