摘要
因果关系认定是交通肇事罪实务定罪的重要环节,交通事故认定书的作用认定与因逃逸致人死亡的因果认定是其中两大难点,应正确对待刑法与交通法规认定责任的区别,实质认定刑事因果。因逃逸致人死亡中因果关系判断的争议集中于"合义务的替代行为"情况下,是否能认定因果关系存在,对此应否定因果关系的成立,限制因逃逸致人死亡的成立范围。
The judicial determination of causation is the important part of conviction. The report about the responsibility of traffic accident and the causation determination of the death caused by escaping are both difficult. It should be treated correctly with the differences between liability determination from criminal law or from traffic law, and the criminal liability should be identified from essence. The controversy about the causation determination of the death caused by escaping is the causation determination of "vicarious act accord with obligation". The determination of the death caused by escaping should be identified restrictively.
作者
戴锦澍
DAI Jin-shu(School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2019年第1期91-95,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
交通肇事罪
因果关系
责任认定
因逃逸致人死亡
traffic delinquency crime
causation
determination of liability
the death caused by escaping