期刊文献+

人工智能介入司法裁判之热与冷思考 被引量:3

A Positive and Negative Thinking on the Issue of Applying Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "206系统"的应用引起了人工智能运用于司法系统的热潮。人工智能存在算法程序的隐蔽性和数据的不完善性,司法具有亲历性以及价值衡量的特点,导致人工智能在司法裁判运用中需要倍加谨慎。应当在不损害司法的公正性以及权威性的前提下,引入人工智能介入司法领域,明确法律人工智能的适用领域、提高司法人员的专业素养、公开算法系统的运行程序,以促进人工智能与司法裁判的完美结合。 The application of "206 system" has aroused the upsurge of the application of AI in the judicial system. However, it is noteworthy that AI is covert in algorithm routine and incomplete in data. Judicial system is personally experienced and have some value judgements, so it is never too cautious to think twice before the application of AI in the judicial system. AI should be used in the judicial system without impairing the fairness and authority of the judiciary. We should clarify the applicable field of AI, improve the professionalism of the judicial personnel, and make the algorithm routine known to the public to promote the perfect combination of AI and the judicial system.
作者 蒋士红 JIANG Shi-hong(Law School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)
出处 《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第2期106-110,共5页 Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 人工智能 司法裁判 亲历性 价值衡量 artificial intelligence judicial adjudication personally experienced value judgement
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献81

共引文献580

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部