论司法解释在空白罪状中的地位和作用——以“长生疫苗案”为例

The Status and Role of Judicial Interpretation in Blank Crime——Take the Changsheng Vaccine Case as An example

"长生疫苗案"的爆发暴露了现行刑法典在药品类犯罪方面存在的漏洞,生产销售假药罪和生产销售劣药罪作为空白罪状,其补充规范局限于假药和劣药的区分,对于"足以严重危害人体健康""严重危害的后果"并没有详细的规定,需要将司法解释纳入补充规范。司法解释在"长生疫苗案"中发挥重要的定罪量刑作用,在地位上需要认识到其并非刑法典的一部分,而是一种独立的法律指引和正向的法律应和。司法解释在空白罪状中具有规范化量刑情节、保持刑法典相对稳定、降低刑法典的修改频率、保障刑法典谦抑性、提供立法经验的作用,并且其需要一方面提高自身的立法水平,另一方面不断改进以发挥其作为补充规范的优势。

The outbreak of the Changsheng vaccine case has exposed the loopholes in the current criminal code in drug crimes,the crime of producing and selling fake drugs and the crime of producing and selling inferior drugs are blank crime,their supplementary specifications are limited to the distinction between fake and inferior drugs,have little regulation of“serious harm to human health”and“the consequences of serious harm”,which means the judicial interpretation should be incorporated.Judicial interpretation plays an important role in conviction and sentencing in the Changsheng vaccine case,it is not part of the penal code,but an independent supplementary norm and positive corresponding law.The judicial interpretation can Standardize the circumstances of sentencing,keep the criminal code relatively stable,reduce the frequency of the criminal code revision,protect the modesty of criminal code,provide legislative experience,it should improve its legislation and keep continuous improvement to play its advantages as a supplementary specification.