期刊文献+

工作投入与离职倾向之间的交叉滞后分析 被引量:2

The Cross-Lagged Analysis on the Relationship between Work Engagement and Turnover Intentions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨工作投入与离职倾向之间的因果关系,基于资源保存理论和社会交换理论视角,采用交叉滞后研究方法对893名员工进行了为期8个月的追踪调查。实证结果表明:①工作投入与离职倾向之间互为因果关系,即工作投入负向预测员工8个月后的离职倾向,离职倾向亦能负向预测8个月后的工作投入;②就预测力大小而言,工作投入对员工离职倾向的负向预测力更强。 In order to examine the causal relationship between work engagement and turnover intentions,this study adopted cross-lagged research method and investigated the 893 employees over a period of 8 months.Drawing on the conservation of resources theory and social exchange theory and,the hypotheses were developed.The empirical results show that:①the causal relationship between work input and turnover intention is that the work input negatively predicts the employee's turnover intention after 8 months,and the turnover intention can also negatively predict the work input after 8 months;②in terms of predictive power,the negative predictive power of work input on employee turnover intention is stronger.
作者 杨伟波 吕莹 谢宝国 郭永兴 YANG Weibo;LV Ying;XIE Baoguo;GUO Yongxing(Organization Department,WUT,Wuhan 430070,China)
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版)》 CAS 2019年第2期143-147,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Information & Management Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(15BGL151)
关键词 工作投入 离职倾向 资源保存理论 社会交换理论 交叉滞后 work engagement turnover intention conservation of resources theory social exchange theory cross-lagged analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献40

  • 1梁小威,廖建桥,曾庆海.基于工作嵌入核心员工组织绩效——自愿离职研究模型的拓展与检验[J].管理世界,2005,21(7):106-115. 被引量:97
  • 2李锐,凌文辁.工作投入研究的现状[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):366-372. 被引量:132
  • 3卞冉,车宏生,阳辉.项目组合在结构方程模型中的应用[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):567-576. 被引量:116
  • 4汪晗,解晓莉.国外关于“工作投入”研究之进展[J].湖南科技学院学报,2007,28(2):98-100. 被引量:12
  • 5侯杰泰 成子娟 马殊赫伯特.验证性因素分析问卷题数及小样本应用策略[J].心理学报,1999,:76-83.
  • 6侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.(2004).结构方程摸型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社.
  • 7Afifi, T. D., & Olson, L. (2005). The chilling effect in families and the pressure to conceal secrets. Communication Monographs, 72, 192-216.
  • 8Alhija, F. N. A., & Wisenbaker, J. (2006). A Monte Carlostudy investigating the impact of item parceling strategies on parameter estimates and their standard errors in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 204-228.
  • 9Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.
  • 10Bandalos, D. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211-240.

共引文献614

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部