期刊文献+

基于能值分析的秸秆-羊-田循环系统生产效率与可持续性评估 被引量:6

Evaluation of production efficiency and sustainability for straw-sheep-cropland recycling agroecosystems based on emergy analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 生态循环农业是解决现代规模化养殖污染的有效手段。该文使用能值分析方法,对现代"秸秆-羊-田"循环系统的生产效率与可持续性进行评估。结果表明,与单一湖羊养殖系统相比,"秸秆-羊-田"复合循环系统的能值转换率降低96.09%,表明循环系统大大提高了终端产品的能值利用效率;能值投资率和环境负载率降低程度达67.66%以上,而可持续发展指数明显增加,表明循环系统在生产过程中能够较好地降低环境压力而具有很好的可持续发展潜力;净能值产出率和能值产投比分别降低70.32%和70.43%,表明复合生态循环系统的生产效率和经济效益有所降低,主要是由于生产原材料(豆粕、秸秆等)、基建与设备投入增加造成。因此,需要对其提供的生态服务功能的正外部性进行经济补偿,补偿标准为380.76元/(只·a)。然而,如果对目前的循环生产过程进行优化,理论上能够提高净能值产出率,从而实现对循环系统环境效益的自我补偿。 Ecological recycling agriculture is an effective practice to solve the pollution from large-scale livestock farming.This study evaluated the production efficiency and sustainability of the straw-sheep-cropland integrated agroecosystem.This integrated system included four subsystems,as the sheep raising subsystem,the organic composting subsystem,the cropping subsystem and the feed producing subsystem.For the sheep raising subsystem,the emergy input of renewable resources was 2.33×1012 Sej,accounting for<0.01%;the emergy input of non-renewable resources was 9.68×1015 Sej,accounting for 0.24%;the purchased economic resource emergy was 4.03×1018Sej,accounting for 99.76%,in which feed and labor were two main components,with a proportion of 84.22%and 10.06%respectively.The emergy output of the sheep husbandary subsystem was 2.65×1019 Sej,including the sheep and manure,accounting for 17.70%and 82.30%respectively.For the organic composting subsystem,the emergy input of renewable resources was 7.69×1012 Sej,accounting for<0.01%;the purchased economic resource emergy input was 2.44×1019 Sej,accounting for>99.90%;in which the raw materials for producing organic fertilizers accounted for the most,including the manure and straw residues with a proportion of 89.31%and 8.81%respectively.The emergy output for the organic compost subsystem was 2.06×1019 Sej,including two sections with equal proportion,one for inside using and the other for outside selling.For the cropping subsystem,the emergy input of renewable resources was 1.12×1017Sej,accounting for 6.16%;the non-renewable resource emergy input was 7.06×1015Sej,accounting for 0.38%;the purchased economic emergy was 1.46×1018 Sej,accounting for 93.46%,in which the chemical fertilizer,labor,electricity,machinery and diesel were the main components with a proportion of 33.60%,26.86%,15.99%,12.78%and 8.61%,respectively.The emergy output was 2.57×1018 Sej,including two parts,grain accounted for 54.08%and straw residues accounted with 45.91%.For the feed-production subsystem,the renewable resource emergy input was 1.95×1013 Sej,accounting for<0.01%;the purchased economic resource was 1.23×1019Sej,accounting for>99.99%,in which the soybean meal and straw residues were two main components,with a proportion of 20.31%and 50.32%,respectively.The only emergy output was feed of 2.11×1019 Sej,with two parts with the inside using of 16.13%and outside selling of 83.87%.Results of evaluation for the integrated system showed that the unit emergy value(UEV)was reduced by 96.09%,which was suggested that the emergy use efficiency was greatly increased comparing to the single sheep husbandry.The emergy investment ratio(EIR)and environment loading ratio(ELR)were decreased by>67.66%,respectively,while the emergy sustainability index(ESI)was evidently enhanced,suggesting that the integrated agroecosystem has a good sustainable potential with low environmental pressure.However,the net emergy yield ratio(EYR)and emergy yield-investment ratio were decreased by 70.32%and 70.43%,respectively,suggesting that the production efficiency and economic benefit were reduced in the integrated agroecosystem.This was caused by increasing cost from raw materials(i.e.bean dregs or straw residues),buildings and equipment.Therefore,the ecological compensation is needed for the positive externality of ecosystem services from the integrated agroecosystem.The compensation standard was estimated as¥380.76/sheep per year based on the net emergy benefit difference.Nonetheless,once the current integrated system is optimized,EYR will be increased in theory and the integrated system can achieve self-compensation for its positive environmental benefits.
作者 朱冰莹 董佳 沈明星 郑建初 Zhu Bingying;Dong Jia;Shen Mingxing;Zheng Jianchu(College of Humanity and Development,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China;Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Taihu Lake Regions of Jiangsu Province,Suzhou 215155,China;Center of Circular Agriculture,Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Nanjing 210095,China)
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第6期235-243,共9页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 江苏省农业科技自主创新资金重点项目(CX(16)1003-13)
关键词 可持续性 秸秆 循环农业系统 能值评估 生产效率 sustainability straw recycling agroecosystem emergy evaluation production efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献323

共引文献287

同被引文献109

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部