期刊文献+

Milligan-Morgan联合芍倍注射术与Milligan-Morgan治疗混合痔的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Milligan-Morgan combined with Shaobei Injection and Milligan-Morgan in Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:讨论Milligan-Morgan联合芍倍注射术治疗混合痔的临床应用价值。方法:将86例患者以住院号单双分为Milligan-Morgan联合芍倍注射术组(治疗组)和Milligan-Morgan组(对照组),每组43例。在手术时间、术后可能并发疼痛、水肿、平均住院日、满意度等方面进行比较。结果:两组在手术时间上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而在术后疼痛、水肿以及平均住院日、满意度等方面两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与Milligan-Morgan相比,Milligan-Morgan联合芍倍注射术简单安全、有效,术后并发症发生率少,是目前治疗混合痔最为微创的手术之一。 Objective:To discuss the clinical value of Milligan-Morgan combined with shaobei injection in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids.Methods:86 patients were divided into Milligan-Morgan combined with shaobei injection group (treatment group) and Milligan-Morgan group (control group),43 cases in each group.The two groups were compared in terms of operation time,postoperative pain,edema,mean hospital stay,and satisfaction.Results:There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( P >0.05),while there were statistically significant differences in postoperative pain,edema,mean hospital stay and satisfaction between the treatment group and the control group ( P <0.05).Conclusion:Milligan-Morgan combined with shaobei injection is simple,safe,effective operation and has a low incidence of postoperative complications compared with Milligan-Morgan.It is one of the most minimally invasive operations for the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids.
作者 黎小平 王凡 刘超 方庆珊 LI Xiaoping;WANG Fan;LIU Chao(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Nanhai Hospital of Southern Medical University,Foshan City,Guangdong Province 528244)
出处 《医学理论与实践》 2019年第8期1130-1131,1137,共3页 The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
关键词 混合痔 MILLIGAN-MORGAN 芍倍注射术 Mixed hemorrhoids Milligan-Morgan Shaobei Injection
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular-suturing device: a new procedure [ C ]. Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy, 777-784.
  • 2Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version5.1.0 [ DO/BL] [ updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from: http:// www.cochrane--handbook.org.
  • 3Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, et al. Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long- term randomized trial[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2004,19:239-244.
  • 4Mehigan BJ, gonson JRT, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy : randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2000,355:782-785.
  • 5Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, et al. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results [J]. World J Surg , 2003,27:203-207.
  • 6Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomyvsopen with Ligasure for prolapsed piles [J]. Surg Endnsc, 2005,19: 235-239.
  • 7Bikhchandani J, Agarwal PN, Kant R, et al. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results ofstapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy [J ]. Am J Surg, 2005, 189:56-60.
  • 8Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexyversus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow-up [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2005,242 : 29-35.
  • 9Kim JS, Vashist YK, Thieltges S, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial [ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013,17 : 1292-1298.
  • 10Van de Stadt J, D'Hoore A, Duinslaeger M, et al. Long-term results after excision haemorrhoideetomyversusstapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a Belgian prospective randomized trial [J]. Aeta Chir Belg, 2005,105: 44-52.

共引文献49

同被引文献32

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部