期刊文献+

术后早期系统康复治疗对高龄半髋置换术患者的影响 被引量:3

Effect of early postoperative systemic rehabilitation on treating elderly patients with hemiarthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨术后早期系统康复治疗对高龄半髋置换术(HA)患者的影响。方法将76例高龄HA患者(年龄>80岁)随机分为实验组(术后早期系统康复治疗)与对照组(传统康复治疗),每组38例。比较2组患者术后1、3、6个月及1年的患髋疼痛评分(VAS评分)、患髋临床功能评定(Harris评分)、影像学评价、并发症发生情况和生活质量评分(SF-36量表)。结果所有患者均未出现失访的情况,实验组术后1、3、6个月及1年的患髋疼痛VAS评分均低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05)。2组术后1、3个月的Harris评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);实验组术后6个月及1年的Harris评分高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。2组术前的股骨皮质指数、CC值比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。2组假体柄髓腔填充率比较,差异也无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。术后3~5 d假体柄髓腔填充率与置换后1、3、6个月及1年内的X线片相比,2组均无明显下沉(<2 mm),延髓的外展角位置未发生明显改变,白髓和股骨柄周围无明显的线条,无假体骨折、周围骨折和松动。对照组并发症发生率为34. 20%,高于实验组的13. 20%,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。实验组与对照组术前的SF-36总分分别为(407. 28±25. 71)、(412. 13±19. 65)分,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);实验组术后3个月的SF-36总分为(682. 46±35. 21)分,对照组为(624. 59±42. 76)分,均显著高于各组术前评分(P <0. 01),且实验组显著高于对照组(P <0. 01)。结论早期全身康复能促进患髋的功能恢复,提高老年患者的生活质量,减少术后并发症的发生,缩短住院时间,减轻经济负担。 Objective To study the effect of early systemic rehabilitation therapy in elderly patients after hemiarthroplasty.Methods A total of 76 elderly patients(aged over 80 years old)with semi-hip replacement surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group(early postoperative systematic rehabilitation therapy after surgery)and control group(the conventional rehabilitation after surgery),with 38 patients in each group.visual analogue scale score(VAS score),hip functional assessment(Harris score),imaging evaluation,complication occurrence and quality of life score(SF-36 scale)at 1,3,6 months and 1 year of follow-up in the two groups were compared.Results No patients withdrew the follow-up.VAS scores in the experimental group at 1,3,6 months and 1 year of follow-up were lower than that in the control group,but no difference was observed(P>0.05).Significant differences in Harris scores between the two groups at 1 and 3 months after surgery were seen(P<0.05).Harris scores at 6 months and 1 year after surgery in the experimental group were significantly higher than that in the control group,but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The preoperative cortical index,filling rate of prosthesis pulp cavity and CC values of two groups showed no statistically significant differences(P>0.05).Filling of prosthesis pulp cavity after 3 to 5 days of the two groups had no obvious sink(<2 mm)when compared with 1,3,6 months and 1 year after the replacement of X-ray plain film.The outreach angle of pulp angular position showed no change,white pulp and femoral componentssurrounding had no bright line,no prosthetic fractures,peripheral fractures and looseness were found.The incidence of complications in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group(34.2%vs.13.2%,P<0.05).Preoperative total scores of SF-36 scale in the experimental group and control group were(407.28±25.71),(412.13±19.65),showing no differences(P>0.05),and postoperative total scores of SF-36 scale were(682.46±35.21),(624.59±42.76),respectively,at 3 month after operation,which were higher than preoperation(P<0.01),and experimental group was higher than the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion Early systemic rehabilitation can promote the recovery of hip function,improve the quality of life of elderly patients,reduce the incidence of postoperative complications,shorten the length of hospital stay,and reduce the economic burden.
作者 唐颂军 刘嵘 裴海涛 TANG Songjun;LIU Rong;PEI Haitao(Department of Orthopaedics,Shanghai Hospital of Posts and Telecommunications,Shanghai,200040)
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2019年第7期16-19,共4页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基金 上海市卫生局课题(20134408)
关键词 半髋置换术 高龄 HARRIS评分 疗效 髓腔填充率 股骨皮质指数 hemiarthroplasty the elderly Harris score efficacy medullary cavity filling rate femoral cortical index
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献83

  • 1吴锋,叶劲,邹仲兵,白波,董伟强.应用全髋关节置换术和半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(7):21-23. 被引量:43
  • 2楼慧玲,梁剑,郭奇峰.老年人髋部骨折围手术期肺部并发症的防治[J].实用医学杂志,2004,20(8):904-905. 被引量:19
  • 3吴在德,吴肇汉.外科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:73-74.
  • 4Florschutz AV,Langford JR,Haidukewych GJ,et al.Femoral neck fractures:current management[J].J Orthop Trauma,2015,29(3):121-129.
  • 5Erickson BJ,Nwachukwu BU,Kiriakopoulos E,et al.In-hospital mortality risk for femoral neck fractures among patients receiving medicare[J].Orthopedics,2015,38(7):593-596.
  • 6Daniel M,Mohammed S,Francis A,et al.Early result of hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fracture neck of femur[J].Niger Med J,2015,56(1):64-68.
  • 7Poignard A,Bouhou M,Pidet O,et al.High dislocation cumulative risk in THA versus hemiarthroplasty for fractures[J].Clin Orthop,2011,469(11):3148-3153.
  • 8Avery PP,Baker RP,Walton MJ,et al.Total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty in mobile,independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck:a seven-to ten-year follow-up report of a prospective randomised controlled trial[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2011,93(8):1045-1048.
  • 9Baker RP,Squires B,Gargan MF,et al.Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile,independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck.A randomized,controlled trial[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88(12):2583-2589.
  • 10Blomfeldt R,Trnkvist H,Eriksson K,et al.A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2007,89(2):160-165.

共引文献218

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部