以助产士主导的家庭群组式孕期保健模式的实践效果

Practice effects of midwife-centered antenatal care model in family groups

目的探讨孕妇参与以助产士主导的家庭群组式孕期保健模式对降低剖宫产率、合理控制新生儿体重的影响。方法现场招募的形式选取2017 年2 月—2018 年1 月在杭州市第一人民医院建卡并定期产检的120 名孕妇为研究对象,按照随机数字表法随机分为试验组和对照组,每组60 名。对照组采取常规孕期保健模式,试验组采取以助产士主导的家庭群组式孕期保健模式。比较两组剖宫产率、产后出血率、新生儿体重、巨大儿发生率、低体重儿发生率等差异。结果试验组剖宫产率8.3%,对照组剖宫产率35.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.570,P<0.01);试验组新生儿出生时体重(3.22±0.39) kg,对照组为(3.51±0.47) kg,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.70,P< 0.01)。结论以助产士主导的家庭群组式孕期保健模式能够降低剖宫产率、合理控制新生儿体重,对开展护理研究和临床护理工作均具有重要意义。

Objective To explore the effects of the midwife-centered antenatal care model attended by pregnant women on reducing cesarean delivery rates and properly controlling neonatal weight. Methods Totally 120 pregnant women who established medical records and attended antenatal care regularly in Hangzhou First People's Hospital from February 2017 to January 2018 were selected by on-site recruiting and divided into the treatment group( n=60) and the control group( n=60) according to the random number table. Pregnant women in the control group received conventional antenatal care, while pregnant women in the treatment group received the midwife-centered antenatal care in family groups. The cesarean delivery rate, postpartum hemorrhage rate, neonatal weight, incidence rate of fetal macrosomia and incidence rate of low birth weight infant were compared between the two groups. Results The cesarean delivery rate of the treatment rate was 8.3%, while that of the control group was 35.0%(χ2=12.570, P<0.01);the neonatal weight of the treatment group was( 3.22±0.39) kg, while that of the control group was( 3.51±0.47) kg( t=-3.70,P<0.01). Conclusions The midwife-centered antenatal care in family groups can reduce cesarean delivery rates and properly control neonatal weight, which is of significance in nursing research and clinical nursing work.