期刊文献+

教研员工作投入:结构、现状与影响因素的研究 被引量:8

Work Engagement of Teacher Trainers: Structure, Status Quo and Influencing Factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 工作投入是描述教研员工作状态的重要构念,采用改编的教研员工作投入量表对来自全国31个省(区、市)的4 752名教研员进行调查。研究结果表明:教研员工作投入由活力、奉献和专注三个因素构成;我国教研员工作投入总体处于中等偏上水平;性别、编制、职称、机构类型和地区等不同层级的因素对教研员的工作投入有显著影响;女教研员的工作投入高于男教研员;有编制教研员的工作投入高于无编制教研员;随职称升高,教研员工作投入水平呈上升趋势;来自省级教研室和教科院/所的教研员,其工作投入水平均显著高于来自省级教育学院的教研员;从东部地区到东北、中部地区再到西部地区,教研员的工作投入水平逐渐降低。 Work engagement is an important construct to describe the mental state of teacher trainers at work. This study conducted a survey of 4,752 teacher trainers from 31 provinces(autonomous regions and municipalities) in China. The results showed that teacher trainers’ work engagement is composed of three constructs: vigor, dedication, and absorption. The status quo of teacher trainer’ work engagement is above the average level. There are significantly different in work engagement among different genders, contract situations, professional titles, organization types, and areas. Work engagement of female teacher trainers is significantly higher than males. Work engagement of contract teacher trainer is significantly higher than those without contract. With the advancement of professional titles, teacher trainers’ work engagement is on the rise. Work engagement of teacher trainers from provincial Teacher Training Office and Academy of Educational Sciences is significantly higher than those from the provincial School of Education. Teacher trainers’ work engagement gradually decreases from the Eastern region to the Northeast, the Central region, and the Western region.
作者 陈国明 胡惠闵 CHEN Guoming;HU Huimin(Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期60-77,共18页 Global Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"促进课堂转型的中小学教研体系重建"(项目编号:16JJD880024) 华东师范大学教育学部2017年博士研究生优秀学位论文培育资助项目的研究成果之一
关键词 教研员 工作投入 teacher trainers work engagement
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献129

  • 1张轶文,甘怡群.中文版Utrecht工作投入量表(UWES)的信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(3):268-270. 被引量:521
  • 2李金波,许百华,陈建明.影响员工工作投入的组织相关因素研究[J].应用心理学,2006,12(2):176-181. 被引量:122
  • 3李锐,凌文辁.工作投入研究的现状[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):366-372. 被引量:132
  • 4李永鑫,张阔.工作倦怠研究的新趋势[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):478-481. 被引量:73
  • 5赵娜,秦金亮.幼儿教师职业生涯周期的职业倦怠研究[J].教师教育研究,2007,19(3):72-76. 被引量:29
  • 6Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307-324.
  • 7Lee, R. T. & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 123-133.
  • 8Leiter, M. P. (1993). Burnout as a developmental process: Consideration of models. In W. B. Schanfeli, C. Maslach, C. & T. Marek (Eds.). Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 237-250). Washington, D C: Taylor & Francis.
  • 9Lorente, L., Salanova, M., Martinez, I., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Extension of the Job Demands Resources model in the prediction of burnout and engagement among teachers over time. Psicothema, 20, 354-360.
  • 10Maslach, C. (1993). Burnout: A multi-dimensional perspective. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach & T. Marek (Eds.). Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 19-32). New York: Taylor & Francis.

共引文献207

同被引文献89

引证文献8

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部