期刊文献+

教育管理中的人性假设:特征、反思与转型 被引量:2

Assumptions about Human Nature in Educational Administration:Characteristics,Rethinking and Transformation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人性假设是教育管理思想发展的基本理论之源。教育管理中的人性假设具有以预成性人性观为逻辑基础,以生成性人性观为演绎前提,以人性自由为终极目的的基本特征。教育管理思想的演进与人们对人性认识的深化相伴而生,在西方教育管理发展史上,先后出现了"经济人""社会人""自我实现人"和"复杂人"等人性假设。经由哲学反思可以发现,它们都存在强调片面人性,忽视整体人性;重视预成人性,轻视人性生成;偏重人性"管理",忽略人性"教育"等认识弊端。实现教育管理思想的当代变迁,应首先完成教育管理人性观念从还原论到整体论,从预成论到生成论,从本体论到实践论的范式转型。 Assumptions of human nature are the basic theory source of education management thought development. The human nature hypothesis in education management has the basic characteristics of preformed human nature as the logical basis,generative human nature as the deductive premise,and human freedom as the ultimate goal. The evolution of education management thought is accompanied by the deepening of people’s understanding of human nature. In the development history of western education management,human nature assumptions such as "Economic person","Social person","Self-actualization person" and "Complex person" have appeared successively. Under philosophical rethinking,we can find that all of them have some cognitive defects,such as emphasizing one-sided of human nature and ignoring the whole human nature,attaching more importance to pre-human nature and despising the generation of human nature,emphasizing the "management" of humanity and ignoring the "educate" of humanity and so on. To realize the contemporary change of education management thought,the assumptions of human nature in educational administration should firstly realize the paradigm transformation from reductionism to holism,then from preformationism to generativism,and from ontology to practicalism.
作者 程丹丹 葛新斌 CHENG Dandan;GE Xinbin(South China Normal University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510631)
机构地区 华南师范大学
出处 《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期13-18,共6页 Modern Education Management
基金 2017年教育部文科一般项目"构建灵活开放多样性的高中教育体系研究"(17YJA880023)
关键词 人性假设 教育管理 哲学反思 assumptions of human nature educational administration philosophical rethinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献104

  • 1卢正惠,秦娟.人性假设与管理学演化的逻辑[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2002,2(2):34-37. 被引量:1
  • 2杨魁森.论商品经济文化的功利性[J].学习与探索,1993(5):91-95. 被引量:1
  • 3劳凯声.中国公共教育体制改革中的公平性问题[J].人民论坛,2005(12):24-26. 被引量:9
  • 4杜威著 孙有中等译.新旧个人主义[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,1997.102.
  • 5[1][2]R. F. Campbell, T. Fleming, L. J. Newell, J. W. Bennion (1987). A History of Thought and Practice in Educational Administration. New York :Teachers College, Columbia University, p. 101.
  • 6[3][35,36,55]W. K. Hoy, C. G. Miskel (1996). Educational Administration: theory, research, and practice. McGraw-Hill, Inc. P. 9,2,19.
  • 7[4]ibid. p. 12.
  • 8[5][32,38]J. A. Culbertson (1988). A Century's Quest for a Knowledge Base. In Norman J. Boyan(ed. 1988): Handbook of Research in Educational Administration. New York: Longman Inc. Pp.3-26,15,17.
  • 9[6]T. Kuhn (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 10[7][15,18]T. J. Sergiovanni(1999). Educational Governance and Administration. Allyn & Bacon Press. Pp 115 - 151,127,130.

共引文献203

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部