期刊文献+

缺失的身体与丢失的感受——艺术人类学舞蹈研究之现代主义方法论反思 被引量:4

Losing Body and Missing Feelings: Reflections on Modernism Methodology in Dance Study of Anthropology
原文传递
导出
摘要 艺术人类学作为文化人类学的分支学科,受到实证主义和理性主义的深刻影响,其晚产和依附性的学科境地,使其遗忘身体和感知觉在艺术形式中的特殊意义。尽管反思人类学对于身体和情感有所关注,使艺术研究开始恢复感性之味觉,但舞蹈研究却因边缘的学科处境,一直以来被整体主义所制约,舞蹈艺术的本体感知经常被忽略。为反思根植于艺术人类学中的理性传统与实证惯性,文章以部分田野经历为基础,反思舞蹈研究中现代主义方法论的局限,探讨"体验式"参与观察、"二度创作"及"个体"行动者在舞蹈研究中的意义。 As a branch discipline of cultural anthropology, its late and dependent subject position make the anthropology of art hard to get rid of the restriction of rationalism heritage. This makes easy to forget the significance of body form and its sense in dance anthropology. Despite the reflection of anthropology had took some attentions on affection, perception as well as emotion on dance field , the edge position of dance anthropology in social science, make the aura of dance gradually disappear. The paper aims to rethink the rational tradition rooted in the anthropology of art and dance study, based on the specific ethnography, discussing "experiential" participant observation , and the " second creation" as well as " individual writing", in order to present what is the most important point in dance anthropology.
作者 刘柳 LIU Liu(School of Dance, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081 , China)
出处 《北京舞蹈学院学报》 CSSCI 2019年第1期39-44,共6页 Journal of Beijing Dance Academy
基金 2018年度国家社会科学基金艺术学青年项目"20世纪舞蹈人类学理论范式研究"(项目编号:18CE182)的研究成果之一
关键词 艺术人类学 舞蹈研究 现代主义方法论 身体缺失 anthropology of art dance study the modernism methodology body missing
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Colin Quigley, "Dance", in Thomas Barfield ed. The Dictionary of Anthropology, Blackwell Publishers Inc. , 1997.
  • 2Kaeppler, Adrienne L. , "The Mystique of Field- work", in Buckland, Theresa J. , ed. Dance in the Field: Theory, Methods and Issues in Dance Ethnography, Basing- stoke: MacMillan Press Ltd. , 1999.
  • 3Alfred L. Kroeber & Clyde Kluckhohn, "Culture : A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions", in Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnolo- gy, 47, 1952.
  • 4Clyde Kluckhohn & William H. Kelly, The Con- cept of Culture, in R. Linton ed. , The Science of Man in the World Crisis, New York: Columbia University Press, 1945.
  • 5Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books, 1973.
  • 6Paul Spencer ed. , Society and the Dance: The So- cial Anthropology of Process and Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985.
  • 7Helena Wulff, "Danee, Anthropology of", in Neff J. Smelser and Paul B. Balte eds. International Encyclope- dia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam, Hol- land: Elsevier, 2001.
  • 8Adrienne L. Kaeppler, Dance Ethnology and the Anthropology of Dance, in Dance Research Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2000.
  • 9Suzanne Youngerman, Curt Sachs and His Herit- age: A Critical Review of World History of the Dance with a Survey of Recent that Perpetuate His Ideas, CORD (Con- gress on Research in Dance) News, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1974.
  • 10Gertrude P. Kurath, Panorama of Dance Ethnolo- gy, in Current Anthropology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1960.

同被引文献165

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部