期刊文献+

社会公平影响政府信任的制度和文化路径分析 被引量:3

A cultural approach to social equity and governmental trust system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 政府信任是政治合法性的基石,体现了民众对政府的支持和认同,具有重要的政治价值。社会公平是公众朴素的现实诉求,维护社会公平是政府不容推脱的基本责任。研究发现:第一,社会公平直接影响政府信任。对社会公平程度评价越高的人们越倾向于信任政府。第二,社会公平通过影响政府绩效间接影响政府信任。对社会公平程度评价越高的人们对政府绩效的评价越好,对政府绩效的评价越好的人们越倾向于信任政府,政府绩效对社会公平和政府信任具有中介作用;第三,社会公平通过影响社会信任间接影响政府信任。对社会公平程度评价越高的人们越可能持有更高的社会信任水平,社会信任水平越高的人们越倾向于信任政府,社会信任对社会公平和政府信任具有中介作用。 Governmental trust is the cornerstone of political legitimacy.Social equity is the realistic demand of the public,and maintaining social equity is the basic responsibility of the government.Firstly,social equity has a direct impact on government trust.Higher the evaluation of social equity,the more people tend to trust the government.Secondly,social equity indirectly affects government trust by influencing government performance.Government performance plays an intermediary role in social equity and government trust.Thirdly,social equity indirectly affects government trust by influencing social trust.The higher the evaluation of social equity,the more likely people are to hold a higher level of social trust.The higher the level of social trust,the more likely people are to trust the government.Social trust plays an intermediary role in social equity and government trust.
作者 马永强 麻宝斌 MA Yong-qiang;MA Bao-bin(School of Administration,Jilin University,Changchun,Jilin 130012,China;School of Urban Economics and Public Management,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China)
出处 《河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2019年第2期119-128,共10页 Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 政府信任 社会公平 制度绩效 社会文化 government trust social equity institutional performance society and culture
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1[英]罗伯特·帕特南.2001.《使民主运转起来》,王列,赖海榕译,南昌:江西人民出版社
  • 2杨国枢.2006.“中国人的社会取向:社会互动的观点”,《中国社会心理学评论》,第一辑:21-55
  • 3郑也夫编.2003.《中国社会中的信任》,北京:中国城市出版社
  • 4Chanley, Virginia A.,Thomas Rudolph and Wendy Rahn, 2000.“The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis.”Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 64: 239-256.
  • 5Chu, Yun-han, Yu-tzung Chang, and Min-hua Huang, 2004. "Modernization, Institutionalism, Traditionalism and the Development of Democratic Orientation in Rural China. " Paper for the Conference of "Grassroots Democracy and Local Governance in China During the Reform Era", Taipei, Oct. 1--2, 2004.
  • 6Dalton, R. and Nhu-ngoc T. Ong, 2005, “Authority Orientations and Democratic Attitudes: A Test of‘Asian Values' Hypothesis.”Japanese Journal of Political Science. Vol. 6, No. 2:211--231.
  • 7Hardin, R., 1998, "Trust in government", in Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi, Eds. Trust and Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 9--27.
  • 8Keele, Luke, 2007. "Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government. " American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 51, No. 2: 241-257.
  • 9K. Newton, 2001. "Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy. " International Political Science Review. Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 203.
  • 10Levi, M. and Laura Stoker, 2000. "Political Trust and Trustworthiness. " Annual Review Political Science. No3: 475--507.

共引文献265

同被引文献37

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部