期刊文献+

玻璃纤维桩和铸造金属桩在修复中的效果对比分析

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较玻璃纤维桩和铸造金属桩在上颌前牙残冠残根修复中的效果。方法:将上颌前牙残冠残根患者77例(90颗患牙)随机分为玻璃纤维桩组和铸造金属桩组,每组各45颗患牙,比较两组的修复成功率和牙齿健康改善情况。结果:玻璃纤维桩组修复成功率93.3%明显高于铸造金属桩组的80.0%(P<0.05)。修复后,玻璃纤维桩组牙龈指数(0.58±0.05)、出血指数(1.08±0.18);明显小于铸造金属桩组的(0.96±007)、(1.97±0.55),P<0.05。结论:上颌前牙残冠残根患者采用璃纤维桩进行修复获得的效果明显优于铸造金属桩修复,临床应用价值高。
作者 宋帼
出处 《中国医疗器械信息》 2019年第7期126-127,共2页 China Medical Device Information
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献52

  • 1邓东来,黄翠.纤维桩系统与金属桩系统性能及临床应用的比较[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2005,32(1):52-54. 被引量:87
  • 2Tamse A, Katz A, Pilo R, Furcation groove of buccal root of maxillary first premolars amorphome tric study. J Endod, 2000,26(6) :359-363.
  • 3Freeman G. The carbon fibre post: metal free, post-endodontic rehabilitation. Oral Health, 1996, 86:23-30.
  • 4Bass EV. Cast post and core foundation for the badly broken down molar tooth[J]. Aust Dent J, 2002,47 (3) : 275-276.
  • 5Schwartz RS,Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth:A literature review[J].Journal of Endodontics,2004,(05):289-301.
  • 6Sorensen JA,Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth[J].Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1990,(05):529-536.
  • 7Gegauff AG. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns[J].Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2000,(02):169-179.
  • 8Tan PL,Aquilino SA,Gratton DG. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations[J].Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2005,(04):331-336.
  • 9Ricketts DN,Tait CM,Higgins AJ. Post and core systems,refinements to tooth preparation and cementation[J].British Dental Journal,2005,(09):533-541.
  • 10Ellner S,Bergendal T,Bergrnan B. Four post-and-core combinations as abutments for fixed single crowns:A prospective up to 10-year study[J].International Journal of Prosthodontics,2003,(03):249-254.

共引文献196

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部